China and ASEAN signed the Framework Agreement on Com-prehensive Economic Coopera-tion on Nov. 4 in preparation for the establishment, within 10 years, of a free-trade area. This not only reflects China's regional integration strategy in the new century, but will also have a drastic impact on the political and economic development of the Asia-Pacific region.
This massive economic entity is expected to have a market of 1.7 billion consumers, a GDP of nearly US$2 trillion and US$1.2 trillion in total trade value. Japan and the US, to avoid losing their stakes in the ASEAN market and their political and economic influence in the region, have also proposed to forge closer econo-mic partnerships with the regional group.
One consequence of all this could turn out to be rivalry between the China-led Asian free-trade area and a future US-led pan-American free trade zone across the Pacific. Those two groupings, plus the EU, will divide the world into three blocs.
ASEAN members have long had sensitive and conflicting feelings about China's economic rise, accession into the WTO and promotion of a China-ASEAN free trade zone. They worry that China will attract all the foreign capital from ASEAN like a magnet, but on the other hand, they are eager to exploit China's 1.3-billion-population market.
Now, China has agreed to provide the three least-developed ASEAN nations -- ?Laos, Cambodia and Myanmar -- ?with preferential treatment starting in 2004 by removing tariffs on more than 600 agricultural, livestock and fisheries products and expanding its participation in the Mekong River development project.
China also sealed the Decla-ration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with ASEAN in order to address the sovereignty dispute over islands. All this demonstrates China's intention of taking concrete action to ease ASEAN anxieties about the "China threat theory."
Undeniably, the signing of the agreement on economic cooperation is advantageous to deepening economic ties between China and ASEAN, while the signing of the declaration on the conduct of parties is conducive to political trust between the two. Following the ASEAN summit in Cambodia, the outside world will find it impossible to view the new ties between China and ASEAN in the traditional light.
In addition, in the China-ASEAN free-trade area, the 10-member bloc will not have to obey Beijing's orders. The area will be constructed along the lines of the already established Asean Free Trade Association (AFTA) and will follow many of the latter's systems and arrangements, hence the name, ASEAN-China (10 plus one) free-trade area. This enhances the possibility that a 10-plus-three area will eventually take shape.
At one time the proposal for an ASEAN-Japan-China-South Korea free-trade area was a hot issue. But this plan was superseded by the China-ASEAN deal because Japan was reluctant to open its agricultural market to ASEAN nations.
Japan was taken aback by the China-ASEAN agreement. To ease the competitive pressure caused by the possibility that Beijing might become the leader in regional integration, Japan has accelerated discussions on a free-trade area. The idea is that the Japan-ASEAN pact will materialize within 10 years but at least one year after the entity between China and ASEAN.
In addition, Japan also played the "Taiwan card," calling for the formation of an Asian free-trade area covering Japan, South Korea, China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and ASEAN. Such a grouping could rival the EU and the North American Free Trade Agreement countries. Japan hopes that the Asian free-trade area will be operative by 2010, which is also the deadline for the APEC forum to conduct trade and investment liberalization.
On the other side of the Paci-fic, US manufacturers and financiers have urged their government to sign free trade pacts with ASEAN nations as soon as possible in a bid to maintain their interests and restrict the expansion of China's economic clout in the region.
But a US plan to establish a trans-Pacific free trade zone has not been well received. Singapore Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong (
Apparently, the pressure posed by the ASEAN-China plan has prompted Japan to accelerate its efforts to form an Asian free-trade area and pushed the US once again to place importance on strengthening its ties with ASEAN.
A foreseeable development is that the Asia-Pacific region will become a battlefield for China, ASEAN, Japan and the US.
In the development process in which several free-trade areas are to take shape in the Asia-Pacific region, what deserves greatest attention is the possible end result. The US is taking active steps to expand NAFTA southward and cooperate with Central and South American countries by 2005 to establish a pan-American free trade zone.
China plans to turn the Shanghai Cooperation Organization into a free-trade area. In combination with the future China-ASEAN free-trade area, a China-led "dragon" of an Asian free-trade area will take shape.
By that time, the Asia-Pacific region will become a battleground in which the pan-American free trade zone and the Asian free-trade area will compete against each other. On the other hand, the EU will definitely become a major economic entity after deepening its economic integration. The global economy will then be divided by the three blocks. But we don't know where Taiwan will position itself. This is something we should be addressing now.
Wu Fu-cheng is an associate research fellow in the international affairs division of the Taiwan Institute of Economic Research.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
RSS