On Nov. 1, Cathay General Hospital director Chen Kai-mo (陳楷模) lashed out at the medical profession for wasting medical resources and for having poor medical ethics, both of which seriously damage patients' rights. He criticized doctors for relying on costly examination equipment, and alleged that doctors encouraged patients -- and even pressured them -- to undergo unnecessary surgery. These charges have being widely aired. The criticism from within the profession and from such a senior level seems to underline the seriousness of the situation.
Chen also said that the Bureau of National Health Insurance's oversight is effectively redundant, as its insurance payment approval system is lax. Following his comments, a number of legislators demanded that the government "sweep away bad doctors, as well as legislators and medical groups that shield these doctors." In response, some of those in charge of medical centers immediately claimed that Chen was talking about individual cases, not describing the general situation. Department of Health officials said that they were strictly supervising the health insurance program and that doctors were complaining about the rigor with which they did so.
Let's put aside for now the issue of whether the problems are general or individual. I believe that the decline in medical ethics is a more serious issue than either poor oversight by the medical authorities or the greedy collusion of doctors. It has caused doctors and patients to lose respect for each other.
Throughout history, the medical profession has brimmed with the noble, humane spirit of those who wished to save the sick and the weak. Such nobility has disappeared as rationality and medical technology have come to be taken for granted. For every patient to expect doctors to treat their bodies with such reverence is simply asking too much. But it is reasonable for a patient to demand at the very least that doctors don't view their operating tables as slaughter houses.
Unfortunately, in modern society, where deep religious beliefs are absent, even that universal value is threatened.
In Taiwan, although Western medical treatment largely replaced traditional Chinese medicine only about a century ago, the superior position of doctors was quickly established because of the public's obsession with scientism and the policy of the Japanese colonial rulers of keeping the people uninformed or misinformed.
The mind has been forgotten, and patients are seen as material objects by the medical organizations. Our society has also lost the pure, simple respect for the existence of human life. When people respect others, it is for their fame or fortune. This being so, many doctors pay undue attention to the famous and the wealthy -- who they think deserve their respect -- and fail to see the preciousness of the lives of ordinary people.
This state of affairs is a contributing factor -- maybe even the primary factor -- in the decline of medical ethics.
It's almost impossible for the government to solve the above problem if it's partly caused by the lack of respect for human life in our culture. Perhaps we should begin with some minor moves. Chen's scathing criticism was based on his own experience. If the medical profession itself were to launch a "conscientious movement" inspired by its own experience, it could in turn inspire society.
I believe that self-improvement on the part of each single individual will better our environment. But the premise for such improvement is that the actions of individuals can spark positive responses in others, including the courage for self-scrutiny, instead of knee-jerk counterattacks.
Kuo Hui-hsin is a lecturer in thanatology at Pingtung Community College.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS