Building a national fingerprint archive has always been a controversial issue, with rights groups and the police taking divergent stances. But does the establishment of such an archive have a direct bearing on success rates in criminal investigations? Is there a need for such an archive?
The police believe a fingerprint archive is necessary to prevent crime and emsure the people's safety. The police cite the rising crime rate and say fingerprints do not leak personal information, so they do not infringe on privacy.
Rights groups believe putting fingerprints on national identity cards is unnecessary and inappropriate. They believe the Ministry of the Interior's plan is an imposition on the public and a waste of money. The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission of the Executive Yuan doesn't believe it is necessary to cause such a hassle at a time when finances are tight. Some academics say adding fingerprints to ID cards wouldn't help in crime investigations since it doesn't cost much to buy a pair of gloves, not to mention that criminals are unlikely to carry valid ID cards to prove their identities.
A computer system that could identify a fingerprint by scanning tens of millions of prints stored in an archive would not only be very costly to build, it would be based on the assumption that everybody is a potential criminal. But would it improve the success rate of criminal investigations?
Only seven nations in the world have national fingerprint archives and neither the US nor Japan are among them. As for the suggestion that an archive of foreigners' fingerprints should be compiled, the question of whether this would deter experienced criminals must be raised again.
Men in Taiwan are fingerprinted when they do their compulsory military service; first-time felons are also fingerprinted. Given that major criminals invariably start out by committing minor crimes, would a national archive provide more help to investigations?
A US public policy research paper said the murder rate in Tai-wan, which has gun control, is 20 percent higher than that of the US, where firearms can be legally owned. The murder rate in Japan, which also has gun control, is only a third of that of the US. This shows gun control is poorly implemented in Taiwan.
With an 80,000-strong police force and surrounded by the sea, Taiwan should have a high success rate in criminal investigations. But many cases remain unsolved. Whether a national fingerprint archive would improve the success rate is debateable.
In advanced democratic countries, people have a clear idea of abiding by the law. People in Tai-wan, however, are increasingly aware of their freedoms as society opens up, but the law-abiding spirit has not improved. Only by nuturing a law-abiding spirit can we develop the law's function of maintaining social order.
Tseng Chao-chang is chairman of the National Bar Association.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS