Building a national fingerprint archive has always been a controversial issue, with rights groups and the police taking divergent stances. But does the establishment of such an archive have a direct bearing on success rates in criminal investigations? Is there a need for such an archive?
The police believe a fingerprint archive is necessary to prevent crime and emsure the people's safety. The police cite the rising crime rate and say fingerprints do not leak personal information, so they do not infringe on privacy.
Rights groups believe putting fingerprints on national identity cards is unnecessary and inappropriate. They believe the Ministry of the Interior's plan is an imposition on the public and a waste of money. The Research, Development and Evaluation Commission of the Executive Yuan doesn't believe it is necessary to cause such a hassle at a time when finances are tight. Some academics say adding fingerprints to ID cards wouldn't help in crime investigations since it doesn't cost much to buy a pair of gloves, not to mention that criminals are unlikely to carry valid ID cards to prove their identities.
A computer system that could identify a fingerprint by scanning tens of millions of prints stored in an archive would not only be very costly to build, it would be based on the assumption that everybody is a potential criminal. But would it improve the success rate of criminal investigations?
Only seven nations in the world have national fingerprint archives and neither the US nor Japan are among them. As for the suggestion that an archive of foreigners' fingerprints should be compiled, the question of whether this would deter experienced criminals must be raised again.
Men in Taiwan are fingerprinted when they do their compulsory military service; first-time felons are also fingerprinted. Given that major criminals invariably start out by committing minor crimes, would a national archive provide more help to investigations?
A US public policy research paper said the murder rate in Tai-wan, which has gun control, is 20 percent higher than that of the US, where firearms can be legally owned. The murder rate in Japan, which also has gun control, is only a third of that of the US. This shows gun control is poorly implemented in Taiwan.
With an 80,000-strong police force and surrounded by the sea, Taiwan should have a high success rate in criminal investigations. But many cases remain unsolved. Whether a national fingerprint archive would improve the success rate is debateable.
In advanced democratic countries, people have a clear idea of abiding by the law. People in Tai-wan, however, are increasingly aware of their freedoms as society opens up, but the law-abiding spirit has not improved. Only by nuturing a law-abiding spirit can we develop the law's function of maintaining social order.
Tseng Chao-chang is chairman of the National Bar Association.
Translated by Francis Huang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS