The opposition just can't bear to give Vice President Annette Lu (
Anyone familiar with international affairs knows that it is naive to say that a contract the size of the LNG one can be made in just one meeting. It is even less likely that any inter-governmental commitment would take place under such hasty circumstances. Skeptics will probably say that Taiwan probably began negotiating with the Indonesian government on the LNG deal long before Lu thought of visiting Jakarta. However, Indonesia's strong interest in landing such a contract with Taiwan was surely prompted by Beijing's decision to sign an LNG contract with Australia, rather than Jakarta, a few days before Lu's trip. In other words, there was simply no time for any under-the-table deal with the Indonesian government.
Moreover, in view of the size of the deal, had the contract been previously promised to Jakarta, surely it would have extended much better treatment to Lu. She would have been able to go directly to Jakarta instead of making a detour to Bali first. She would have been able to openly meet a lot of top government officials and politicians. After all, money does wonders when one is looking for new friends.
In all likelihood, Lu simply informed the Indonesian government that Taiwan was interested in buying LNG and invited Jakarta to make a bid. That is certainly no crime. After all, the WTO allows the purchasing government to contact or invite sellers it deems capable of providing the needed goods to bid for the contract. So long as Taiwan complies with the transparency and non-discrimination requirements, along with other procedural requirements, it is in line with the WTO rules.
Moreover, Taiwan Power Co (
As for the ban on the importation of Indonesian workers, the Council of Labor Affairs has remained consistent on the conditions for lifting the ban. Lu's trip did, however, convince the Indonesian government of Taipei's hope to resolve differences on the issue and prompt it to send a delegation to negotiate the matter. There has been nothing to suggest that Lu overstepped the bounds of her role.
Lu's visit will be beneficial to everyone in Taiwan, not just the DPP. Why can't the opposition understand this and rejoice like everyone else for a change?
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS