"When cross-strait relations are not doing well, the stock market will do well." This dictum may sound extremely jarring the first time you hear it. People who carry China in their hearts may stomp their feet in disapproval. Indeed, everyone says now, "Only when cross-strait relations are doing well will the stock market do well." But I would like to remind people that, after more than 10 years of experience, the exact opposite is true.
Advocates of the "go west" policy will certainly reject this, saying, "Didn't the TAIEX suffer a steep 284-point fall after the `one country on each side' speech?" That's true, but we should understand that after President Chen Shui-bian (
If we follow normal thinking, this mention of the "one country on each side" dictum should be good news for the stock market.
It's good news for the stock market because tensions rise whenever Taiwan insists on something in cross-strait rela-tions. The other side then makes one angry gesture after the other, causing Taiwan's government, businesses and general public to adopt a more conservative attitude toward investing in China. The capital outflow to China will then slow down, which means the amount of capital staying in Taiwan increases. The stock market will then rise as a result of increased investment within Taiwan.
This process of changes in the direction of capital flow followed by economic prosperity or decline is not just a logical deduction. It has been proven over several decades of practice. The scenario that the pro-unification camp uses as a threat -- that tensions will scare capital away and the economy will then collapse -- has never happened.
Let's look at history. From 1949 to 1987, "absolute irreconcilability" was the key note in cross-strait relations. Hostility ran high and there was no contact. But Taiwan created an economic miracle during that period. The stock market took a big leap forward every few years. In 1990, the government eased restrictions on indirect investment in China.
In 1992, the Statute Governing the Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (
In January 1993, the index fell to a low of 3,098 points. Improving cross-strait relations brought the doldrums, not prosperity, to Taiwan.
Relations tensed once again in the run-up to the 1996 presidential election, with China firing missiles into the seas near Taiwan. In September 1996, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) proposed the "no haste, be patient" policy aimed at restraining business investment in China. Cross-strait relations hit rock bottom during this period, but Taiwan's stock market started rising all the way to August 1997, when it peaked at 10,256 points. It was the biggest upsurge in the TAIEX index since 1990, once again attesting to the claim that the stock market does well whenever cross-strait relations are doing poorly.
Unfortunately, new regulations for China investments went into effect in August 1997. Cross-strait relations improved and the China fever heated up. Meanwhile, the TAIEX fell into a bear market. In July 1999, Lee redefined cross-strait relations as "special state-to-state" in nature and tensions rose again. Seven months later, the TAIEX once again hit a peak of 10,393 points.
After coming to power in May 2000, the DPP government worked hard to improve cross-strait relations and continuously made goodwill gestures. The investment review committee also approved almost every application for investment in China. Cross-strait relations moved towards greater stability, but illegal Taiwanese investments in Shanghai-based Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (中芯) and by Grace Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp (宏力半導體) incurred a capital outflow of at least US$100 million.
Capital losses, combined with the sluggish global economy, led to the biggest slump in 10 years, once again proving that no matter how well cross-strait relations go, they are of no help to improving Taiwan's economic prospects.
On the contrary, such good relations accelerated the fall in real estate and stock prices, and caused non-performing loans and unemployment to rise.
I hope that the above points will make readers understand that the reasoning behind the statement that "when cross-strait relations are not doing well, the stock market will do well" is correct and that the idea that "only when relations are doing well will the stock market do well" harms the economy and deludes the people.
Judging by experience from the period of "absolute irreconcilability," the "no haste, be patient policy" and the "state-to-state" model, the "one country on each side" speech should also create a bull market. One condition, however, is that the government persists and does not retreat. It should adjust the China policy of the last two years -- which was biased toward "active opening" -- back toward placing equal importance on "effective management."
In other words, if finance and economic policies can be appro-priately adjusted within the "one country on each side" framework, the persistence in that framework will also rebuild the confidence and dignity of the people. Investors will then enjoy a period of rising share prices. It is something to look forward to.
Remember this: "When cross-strait relations are not doing well, the stock market will do well." That is the only way that Taiwan will be able to globalize, escape the attraction to China and marginalization, and regain economic freedom.This is also the only way to return to past days of growth and bring wealth to the 23 million people of Taiwan.
Huang Tien-lin is a national policy adviser to the president.
Translated by Francis Huang and Perry Svensson
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS