Military cooperation crucial
MisperceptionsWu Ming-chi's (吳明基) article ("US military cooperation a must," Aug 7, page 8) is an inside analysis of the military exchanges between Taiwan and the US. As an active duty military officer, I fully support his opinions.
I had the privilege to be selected as a military exchange student to study in the US on an ROC air force scholarship and I graduated from the Citadel. I had the opportunity to participate in many military exchange activities between Taiwan and the US military in recent years.
Under the Taiwan Relations Act, Taiwan is able to procure necessary defensive weaponry from US, via the Foreign Military Sales program, to defend itself. In the past decade, Tai-wan has acquired substantial amounts of military hardware from the US, such as F-16 fighter jets, M-48 tanks, Knox destroyers, etc.
US President George W. Bush has also approved the sale of diesel-powered submarines -- a move that is regarded as a major breakthrough in mutual cooperation. Without doubt, it seems we have everything we want in our arsenal.
Most people in our society prefer these big-ticket items because they symbolize strong firepower. However, defense experts know that it's more important for Taiwan's military to enhance the quality of its forces, especially in field training and mutual exchanges with US military. Through frequent routine exchanges, our officers at all levels will be able to learn a lot from their US counterparts. The more we interact with the US military, the better we will understand each other. It surely is a win-win deal for both sides.
For instance, the US military has conducted several successful military interventions overseas. How do they achieve these goals with minimum casualties? The success depends heavily on an integrated C41SR (Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Intelligence and Surveillance) architecture to support the whole operation.
Taiwan's military is moving to upgrade many of its operational systems but does not appear to have an unified, overall C41SR infrastructure to ensure that planned systems will operate together in a synergistic manner and provide the anticipated increase in overall defensive capability.
It doesn't matter how many more weapon systems we are going to procure in the future, what it counts is how well we operate the available hardware right now.
From the standpoint of the US' strategy, it expects Taiwan to stand as a reliable partner in Pacific region. Therefore, mutual cooperation by the two sides is an inevitable trend. To achieve this objective, Taiwan's military should reduce the gap which resulted from US-Sino struggles over the past decades.
Captain Frank Huang
Taoyuan
Misunderstandings
The article about a Canadian woman who was raped 10 month ago and still waits for the district prosecutor's response, in addition to having been treated so indifferently by the police, infuriated me no end as it reflected my own experience in this "international" city Taipei 100 percent ("Rape victim blasts prosecutors," Aug. 17, page 2).
I have been living in this city for more than five years and the amount of indifference which has confronted me every time I needed help from any given police precinct has left me incredulous, as if I was a black man in the south of the US during the 1960s. Almost every time, when I meet new people in the city, they automatically assume that I'm an English teacher in some kindergarten. If I were from Indonesia, certainly they would assume that I'm an au pair or something like that.
Many Taipei citizens, including the police, don't realize that not every foreigner coming to Taiwan is a low-salary worker, staying here only for a couple of months and then going back. A lot of foreigners are studying and working here on a very sophisticated level of professionalism and want to be treated in that way. However, the rule of law must extend to all people equally, regardless of their social-economic background.
If the city, including it's governmental branches, is unable to attract and keep professional people within it's territory, those very people responsible for this flaw shouldn't be surprised if the city (or country) falls even further behind on the international stage of political, economical and cultural competition.
Claudio Cariola
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its