Military cooperation crucial
MisperceptionsWu Ming-chi's (吳明基) article ("US military cooperation a must," Aug 7, page 8) is an inside analysis of the military exchanges between Taiwan and the US. As an active duty military officer, I fully support his opinions.
I had the privilege to be selected as a military exchange student to study in the US on an ROC air force scholarship and I graduated from the Citadel. I had the opportunity to participate in many military exchange activities between Taiwan and the US military in recent years.
Under the Taiwan Relations Act, Taiwan is able to procure necessary defensive weaponry from US, via the Foreign Military Sales program, to defend itself. In the past decade, Tai-wan has acquired substantial amounts of military hardware from the US, such as F-16 fighter jets, M-48 tanks, Knox destroyers, etc.
US President George W. Bush has also approved the sale of diesel-powered submarines -- a move that is regarded as a major breakthrough in mutual cooperation. Without doubt, it seems we have everything we want in our arsenal.
Most people in our society prefer these big-ticket items because they symbolize strong firepower. However, defense experts know that it's more important for Taiwan's military to enhance the quality of its forces, especially in field training and mutual exchanges with US military. Through frequent routine exchanges, our officers at all levels will be able to learn a lot from their US counterparts. The more we interact with the US military, the better we will understand each other. It surely is a win-win deal for both sides.
For instance, the US military has conducted several successful military interventions overseas. How do they achieve these goals with minimum casualties? The success depends heavily on an integrated C41SR (Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Intelligence and Surveillance) architecture to support the whole operation.
Taiwan's military is moving to upgrade many of its operational systems but does not appear to have an unified, overall C41SR infrastructure to ensure that planned systems will operate together in a synergistic manner and provide the anticipated increase in overall defensive capability.
It doesn't matter how many more weapon systems we are going to procure in the future, what it counts is how well we operate the available hardware right now.
From the standpoint of the US' strategy, it expects Taiwan to stand as a reliable partner in Pacific region. Therefore, mutual cooperation by the two sides is an inevitable trend. To achieve this objective, Taiwan's military should reduce the gap which resulted from US-Sino struggles over the past decades.
Captain Frank Huang
Taoyuan
Misunderstandings
The article about a Canadian woman who was raped 10 month ago and still waits for the district prosecutor's response, in addition to having been treated so indifferently by the police, infuriated me no end as it reflected my own experience in this "international" city Taipei 100 percent ("Rape victim blasts prosecutors," Aug. 17, page 2).
I have been living in this city for more than five years and the amount of indifference which has confronted me every time I needed help from any given police precinct has left me incredulous, as if I was a black man in the south of the US during the 1960s. Almost every time, when I meet new people in the city, they automatically assume that I'm an English teacher in some kindergarten. If I were from Indonesia, certainly they would assume that I'm an au pair or something like that.
Many Taipei citizens, including the police, don't realize that not every foreigner coming to Taiwan is a low-salary worker, staying here only for a couple of months and then going back. A lot of foreigners are studying and working here on a very sophisticated level of professionalism and want to be treated in that way. However, the rule of law must extend to all people equally, regardless of their social-economic background.
If the city, including it's governmental branches, is unable to attract and keep professional people within it's territory, those very people responsible for this flaw shouldn't be surprised if the city (or country) falls even further behind on the international stage of political, economical and cultural competition.
Claudio Cariola
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS