When Xinhua, China's mouthpiece, ladles on the scorn, you know you have struck gold. Latest up for denigration is Vice President Annette Lu (
Of course we cannot pretend that Lu's trip went without a hitch. The can-she-enter-Jakarta-or-not nonsense at the beginning showed either a massive misunderstanding on the part of the agencies in Taipei that arranged her trip or last-minute cowardice on the part of the Indonesian government. If the latter there is nothing that can be done, if the former then somebody in Taipei has earned a demerit or two.
In the end, of course, Lu's trip worked out. She got to see whom she wanted to see. She was allowed to enter Jakarta and the embarrassment of having to shop in Bali for a day while the Indonesian government decided what to do, was forgotten.
But something still rankles about the trip, beyond, of course, the international pandering to the whims of China that restricts the places to which Taiwan's democratically elected leaders may travel and the guise in which they may go.
That something is the glee with which the local media and, of course, their blue camp cronies jumped on Lu's embarrassment and used it to belittle both the vice president and her trip. About the least offensive remarks among these critics were that the government should be spending more time on the economy than on aggrandizing diplomatic trips.
This last argument is particularly stupid -- though from the KMT one can expect little else -- since the main reason for the economic downturn is 10 years of "put all of your economic eggs in the high-tech-sales-to-the-US basket" policy from the KMT, something that will probably require the best part of another decade for the DPP to reverse.
More widespread seems to have been the argument that Lu was wrong for trying to go to Indonesia in the first place because it left Taiwan open to a slap in the face. This is also absurd. The party in error here, and quite categorically so, is Beijing for having the temerity to try to interfere in and make demands concerning the bilateral affairs of Taiwan and Indonesia. There is a familiar blue camp logic at work here in which it is always Taiwan that is to blame for "provoking" China, it is never China that is at fault for its reaction.
Lu's trip to Indonesia was little different from many trips made by KMT figures in the past. We remember how former president Lee Teng-hui (
The point is that if Taiwan wants diplomatic relations, in the current climate of Chinese antipathy it has to take risks and face setbacks. If the KMT is interested in the survival of the ROC -- always a very debatable matter these days -- it will have no other choice but to do exactly the same thing if it ever regains power. Of course with KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not