When Xinhua, China's mouthpiece, ladles on the scorn, you know you have struck gold. Latest up for denigration is Vice President Annette Lu (
Of course we cannot pretend that Lu's trip went without a hitch. The can-she-enter-Jakarta-or-not nonsense at the beginning showed either a massive misunderstanding on the part of the agencies in Taipei that arranged her trip or last-minute cowardice on the part of the Indonesian government. If the latter there is nothing that can be done, if the former then somebody in Taipei has earned a demerit or two.
In the end, of course, Lu's trip worked out. She got to see whom she wanted to see. She was allowed to enter Jakarta and the embarrassment of having to shop in Bali for a day while the Indonesian government decided what to do, was forgotten.
But something still rankles about the trip, beyond, of course, the international pandering to the whims of China that restricts the places to which Taiwan's democratically elected leaders may travel and the guise in which they may go.
That something is the glee with which the local media and, of course, their blue camp cronies jumped on Lu's embarrassment and used it to belittle both the vice president and her trip. About the least offensive remarks among these critics were that the government should be spending more time on the economy than on aggrandizing diplomatic trips.
This last argument is particularly stupid -- though from the KMT one can expect little else -- since the main reason for the economic downturn is 10 years of "put all of your economic eggs in the high-tech-sales-to-the-US basket" policy from the KMT, something that will probably require the best part of another decade for the DPP to reverse.
More widespread seems to have been the argument that Lu was wrong for trying to go to Indonesia in the first place because it left Taiwan open to a slap in the face. This is also absurd. The party in error here, and quite categorically so, is Beijing for having the temerity to try to interfere in and make demands concerning the bilateral affairs of Taiwan and Indonesia. There is a familiar blue camp logic at work here in which it is always Taiwan that is to blame for "provoking" China, it is never China that is at fault for its reaction.
Lu's trip to Indonesia was little different from many trips made by KMT figures in the past. We remember how former president Lee Teng-hui (
The point is that if Taiwan wants diplomatic relations, in the current climate of Chinese antipathy it has to take risks and face setbacks. If the KMT is interested in the survival of the ROC -- always a very debatable matter these days -- it will have no other choice but to do exactly the same thing if it ever regains power. Of course with KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS