When Xinhua, China's mouthpiece, ladles on the scorn, you know you have struck gold. Latest up for denigration is Vice President Annette Lu (
Of course we cannot pretend that Lu's trip went without a hitch. The can-she-enter-Jakarta-or-not nonsense at the beginning showed either a massive misunderstanding on the part of the agencies in Taipei that arranged her trip or last-minute cowardice on the part of the Indonesian government. If the latter there is nothing that can be done, if the former then somebody in Taipei has earned a demerit or two.
In the end, of course, Lu's trip worked out. She got to see whom she wanted to see. She was allowed to enter Jakarta and the embarrassment of having to shop in Bali for a day while the Indonesian government decided what to do, was forgotten.
But something still rankles about the trip, beyond, of course, the international pandering to the whims of China that restricts the places to which Taiwan's democratically elected leaders may travel and the guise in which they may go.
That something is the glee with which the local media and, of course, their blue camp cronies jumped on Lu's embarrassment and used it to belittle both the vice president and her trip. About the least offensive remarks among these critics were that the government should be spending more time on the economy than on aggrandizing diplomatic trips.
This last argument is particularly stupid -- though from the KMT one can expect little else -- since the main reason for the economic downturn is 10 years of "put all of your economic eggs in the high-tech-sales-to-the-US basket" policy from the KMT, something that will probably require the best part of another decade for the DPP to reverse.
More widespread seems to have been the argument that Lu was wrong for trying to go to Indonesia in the first place because it left Taiwan open to a slap in the face. This is also absurd. The party in error here, and quite categorically so, is Beijing for having the temerity to try to interfere in and make demands concerning the bilateral affairs of Taiwan and Indonesia. There is a familiar blue camp logic at work here in which it is always Taiwan that is to blame for "provoking" China, it is never China that is at fault for its reaction.
Lu's trip to Indonesia was little different from many trips made by KMT figures in the past. We remember how former president Lee Teng-hui (
The point is that if Taiwan wants diplomatic relations, in the current climate of Chinese antipathy it has to take risks and face setbacks. If the KMT is interested in the survival of the ROC -- always a very debatable matter these days -- it will have no other choice but to do exactly the same thing if it ever regains power. Of course with KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
RSS