When Xinhua, China's mouthpiece, ladles on the scorn, you know you have struck gold. Latest up for denigration is Vice President Annette Lu (
Of course we cannot pretend that Lu's trip went without a hitch. The can-she-enter-Jakarta-or-not nonsense at the beginning showed either a massive misunderstanding on the part of the agencies in Taipei that arranged her trip or last-minute cowardice on the part of the Indonesian government. If the latter there is nothing that can be done, if the former then somebody in Taipei has earned a demerit or two.
In the end, of course, Lu's trip worked out. She got to see whom she wanted to see. She was allowed to enter Jakarta and the embarrassment of having to shop in Bali for a day while the Indonesian government decided what to do, was forgotten.
But something still rankles about the trip, beyond, of course, the international pandering to the whims of China that restricts the places to which Taiwan's democratically elected leaders may travel and the guise in which they may go.
That something is the glee with which the local media and, of course, their blue camp cronies jumped on Lu's embarrassment and used it to belittle both the vice president and her trip. About the least offensive remarks among these critics were that the government should be spending more time on the economy than on aggrandizing diplomatic trips.
This last argument is particularly stupid -- though from the KMT one can expect little else -- since the main reason for the economic downturn is 10 years of "put all of your economic eggs in the high-tech-sales-to-the-US basket" policy from the KMT, something that will probably require the best part of another decade for the DPP to reverse.
More widespread seems to have been the argument that Lu was wrong for trying to go to Indonesia in the first place because it left Taiwan open to a slap in the face. This is also absurd. The party in error here, and quite categorically so, is Beijing for having the temerity to try to interfere in and make demands concerning the bilateral affairs of Taiwan and Indonesia. There is a familiar blue camp logic at work here in which it is always Taiwan that is to blame for "provoking" China, it is never China that is at fault for its reaction.
Lu's trip to Indonesia was little different from many trips made by KMT figures in the past. We remember how former president Lee Teng-hui (
The point is that if Taiwan wants diplomatic relations, in the current climate of Chinese antipathy it has to take risks and face setbacks. If the KMT is interested in the survival of the ROC -- always a very debatable matter these days -- it will have no other choice but to do exactly the same thing if it ever regains power. Of course with KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers