In the face of China's ruthless machinations, President Chen Shui-bian (
Politically, Taiwan should firmly adopt the position that there is "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, refuse to accept "one country, two systems" and hold a public referendum to prevent any change to the status quo.
In terms of the economy, the nation should redirect its economic and trade policies which currently lean too far toward China. As indicated by Chen, a pragmatic approach is to see the Chinese market as simply part of our global market, rather than Taiwan's sole export market. In formulating global strategy, Taiwanese businesspeople should focus more on investing in Southeast Asia.
If businesses keep their roots in their motherland and seek to continue to develop themselves, the domestic employment rate will improve, stimulating consumer demand. This is, of course, the best way to go. As globalization continues apace, however, Taiwan's businesses must become globalized as well if they are to achieve sustainable operations and growth. Foreign investments by businesses are in essence a component of their expansion strategy, as well as an extension of of the economic prowess of their mother country.
Taiwan's China fever of recent years, however, should not be mistaken for globalization. It is in fact an irrational economic malaise, wrapped in the banner of Chinese nationalism. It is the fever alone that prompts businesses to jump on the bandwagon to China, pouring money into the country and leaving debts in Taiwan, irrespective of whether they actually need to make foreign investments. This has caused a hollowing out of Taiwan's industries. Also infected by the bug, members of the general public take whatever little sums of money they may have and blindly follow each other's footsteps into the whirlpool that is China. The most egregious aspect of all this is that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait remain in a state of hostility. The relationship between China and Taiwan can in no way be compared to the relations between other states. The sinicization of Taiwan is therefore not globalization at all. Rather, it is collective self-destruction on the part of Taiwan society.
Any rational person can see perfectly clearly that sinicization is not globalization. In Taiwan's twisted and abnormal environment, however, pro-unification politicians and the media do their best to beautify everything related to China. The prospects of the Chinese market are particularly exalted by these individuals. China is depicted as a paradise with gold to be discovered everywhere. Any policy proposal by the Taiwan government to find substitutes for the Chinese market invites immediate attack from the pro-unification camp and becomes the target of malicious and twisted interpretations.
The government's "go south" policy is a classic example. The policy was first proposed by Lee Teng-hui (
Was the "go south " policy really a failure, though? If it was such a mistake, what is causing Chen to return to the southbound path? Obviously, while the policy suffered some setbacks, it was not a failure. The public's negative impression was deliberately created by a certain group of people who took advantage of the public's lack of information.
Former chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development and current chairman of the Taiwan Thinktank (台灣智庫), Chen Po-chih (陳博志), is extremely worried about China's duplicitous policies, which, on the one hand, lure Taiwanese businessmen to China, and, on the other, suppress Taiwan's room for survival within international organizations. Chen Po-chih thinks that, in terms of its economy, Taiwan should try not to rely on China too much. As early as 1991, Chen Po-chih proposed an economic strategy under which Taiwan would increase its investments in, and trade with, Southeast Asia. Three years later, President Lee officially declared the "go south" policy.
Chen Po-chih pointed out that many publicly traded companies that had invested in Southeast Asia had enjoyed great success. These businesses were located in Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Their products ranged from traditional goods, such as paper products, foods and textiles, to electronic products and financial goods and services. But the people of Taiwan were not told of such successes. The information was suppressed.
Now President Chen has once again endorsed the "go south" policy. By now, most Southeast Asian countries have put the financial crisis behind them, and some of their economies are performing better than ever. Economic growth in Vietnam and the Philippines for example, represents a drastic improvement over the past. In particular, 10 Southeast Asian countries are gradually forming a free trade area.
Since Taiwan's initial launch of the "go south" policy, the nation has signed agreements with most countries in the region to protect Taiwanese investments there and to avoid dual taxation. Taiwanese businesspeople investing there not only enjoy the protection of the law, but are also in a favorable position to target the entire regional market, benefiting from various forms of preferential treatment, and the convenience of the free flow of capital and personnel. This can help Taiwan to avoid marginalization in the Southeast Asian market.
More to the point, however, now is a most opportune time to rehabilitate the "go south" policy. To do so would not be to produce a stale rehash of old policies. From the point of view of diversification of investment risk, as pointed out by Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (
Neither "go south" nor "go west," however, will revive Taiwan's economy. Only the removal of investment barriers and improvements in the investment environment in Taiwan can make businesses willing to keep their roots in Taiwan. This is the way to ensure Taiwan's survival.
When businesses have to make overseas investments out of sheer operational need, they should develop global strategies, rather than carelessly overlooking political and market risks and recklessly going west, placing all of Taiwan's assets in the hands of a hostile country. This is tantamount to political and economic suicide.
Rational people do not place all their eggs in one basket. While the "go south" policy may have its limitations, it can create diversity in Taiwan's investments, and counter China's leverage over Taiwan's economy. The government's call to head south comes just at the right time. It truly demands the business sector's reflection and consideration.
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that