In the face of China's ruthless machinations, President Chen Shui-bian (
Politically, Taiwan should firmly adopt the position that there is "one country on each side" of the Taiwan Strait, refuse to accept "one country, two systems" and hold a public referendum to prevent any change to the status quo.
In terms of the economy, the nation should redirect its economic and trade policies which currently lean too far toward China. As indicated by Chen, a pragmatic approach is to see the Chinese market as simply part of our global market, rather than Taiwan's sole export market. In formulating global strategy, Taiwanese businesspeople should focus more on investing in Southeast Asia.
If businesses keep their roots in their motherland and seek to continue to develop themselves, the domestic employment rate will improve, stimulating consumer demand. This is, of course, the best way to go. As globalization continues apace, however, Taiwan's businesses must become globalized as well if they are to achieve sustainable operations and growth. Foreign investments by businesses are in essence a component of their expansion strategy, as well as an extension of of the economic prowess of their mother country.
Taiwan's China fever of recent years, however, should not be mistaken for globalization. It is in fact an irrational economic malaise, wrapped in the banner of Chinese nationalism. It is the fever alone that prompts businesses to jump on the bandwagon to China, pouring money into the country and leaving debts in Taiwan, irrespective of whether they actually need to make foreign investments. This has caused a hollowing out of Taiwan's industries. Also infected by the bug, members of the general public take whatever little sums of money they may have and blindly follow each other's footsteps into the whirlpool that is China. The most egregious aspect of all this is that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait remain in a state of hostility. The relationship between China and Taiwan can in no way be compared to the relations between other states. The sinicization of Taiwan is therefore not globalization at all. Rather, it is collective self-destruction on the part of Taiwan society.
Any rational person can see perfectly clearly that sinicization is not globalization. In Taiwan's twisted and abnormal environment, however, pro-unification politicians and the media do their best to beautify everything related to China. The prospects of the Chinese market are particularly exalted by these individuals. China is depicted as a paradise with gold to be discovered everywhere. Any policy proposal by the Taiwan government to find substitutes for the Chinese market invites immediate attack from the pro-unification camp and becomes the target of malicious and twisted interpretations.
The government's "go south" policy is a classic example. The policy was first proposed by Lee Teng-hui (
Was the "go south " policy really a failure, though? If it was such a mistake, what is causing Chen to return to the southbound path? Obviously, while the policy suffered some setbacks, it was not a failure. The public's negative impression was deliberately created by a certain group of people who took advantage of the public's lack of information.
Former chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development and current chairman of the Taiwan Thinktank (台灣智庫), Chen Po-chih (陳博志), is extremely worried about China's duplicitous policies, which, on the one hand, lure Taiwanese businessmen to China, and, on the other, suppress Taiwan's room for survival within international organizations. Chen Po-chih thinks that, in terms of its economy, Taiwan should try not to rely on China too much. As early as 1991, Chen Po-chih proposed an economic strategy under which Taiwan would increase its investments in, and trade with, Southeast Asia. Three years later, President Lee officially declared the "go south" policy.
Chen Po-chih pointed out that many publicly traded companies that had invested in Southeast Asia had enjoyed great success. These businesses were located in Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines. Their products ranged from traditional goods, such as paper products, foods and textiles, to electronic products and financial goods and services. But the people of Taiwan were not told of such successes. The information was suppressed.
Now President Chen has once again endorsed the "go south" policy. By now, most Southeast Asian countries have put the financial crisis behind them, and some of their economies are performing better than ever. Economic growth in Vietnam and the Philippines for example, represents a drastic improvement over the past. In particular, 10 Southeast Asian countries are gradually forming a free trade area.
Since Taiwan's initial launch of the "go south" policy, the nation has signed agreements with most countries in the region to protect Taiwanese investments there and to avoid dual taxation. Taiwanese businesspeople investing there not only enjoy the protection of the law, but are also in a favorable position to target the entire regional market, benefiting from various forms of preferential treatment, and the convenience of the free flow of capital and personnel. This can help Taiwan to avoid marginalization in the Southeast Asian market.
More to the point, however, now is a most opportune time to rehabilitate the "go south" policy. To do so would not be to produce a stale rehash of old policies. From the point of view of diversification of investment risk, as pointed out by Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (
Neither "go south" nor "go west," however, will revive Taiwan's economy. Only the removal of investment barriers and improvements in the investment environment in Taiwan can make businesses willing to keep their roots in Taiwan. This is the way to ensure Taiwan's survival.
When businesses have to make overseas investments out of sheer operational need, they should develop global strategies, rather than carelessly overlooking political and market risks and recklessly going west, placing all of Taiwan's assets in the hands of a hostile country. This is tantamount to political and economic suicide.
Rational people do not place all their eggs in one basket. While the "go south" policy may have its limitations, it can create diversity in Taiwan's investments, and counter China's leverage over Taiwan's economy. The government's call to head south comes just at the right time. It truly demands the business sector's reflection and consideration.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS