The question of whether China Airlines should buy aircraft from Boeing or Airbus is creating controversy in Taiwan. There is nothing unusual about such a dispute. What is strange, however, is that while controversy rages and the US and Europe have gotten involved, no one has pointed out that China has taken the use of what we might call "aircraft-purchase diplomacy" to the extreme, buying more than 100 planes over the last 10 years.
Since the Tiananmen massacre China has used various aircraft purchases to sow dissension between the US and Europe in order to break its own diplomatic isolation. Every time the US would discuss whether to continue granting China most-favored-nation status, or when Chinese leaders are about to visit the US and expect to be pressured on human-rights issues, Beijing has tried to pressure the US by waving aircraft orders around.
Orders for Boeing aircraft have been an important part of this strategy, and Boeing has therefore lobbied the White House, stressing the importance of Sino-US relations. To break out of the difficult situation created by the boycott by major Western nations of former premier Li Peng (
Unificationists in Taiwan have never blamed China for its total politicization of trade. But with China making every effort to sideline Taiwan diplomatically, these people have become righteousness personified, blaming the government for trying to find ways of making an aircraft purchase improve Taiwan's diplomatic situation. In the end, their argument is just an attempt to help China isolate Taiwan by sowing discord between Taiwan and the West.
They say that by buying aircraft from the US, Taiwan is turning France into an enemy. Isn't this tantamount to sowing discord between Taiwan and France? Why would the loss of one single contract turn France into an enemy? Apart from these 10 planes, are there no other
factors influencing the relationship between Taiwan and France? Is there no other possible business to be done between Taiwan and France, no other areas where the two can cooperate?
These unificationists argue that Taiwan is a US pawn, a bastard son of America. They forget that if it weren't for US military and US economic aid, or for the US Seventh Fleet patrolling the Taiwan Strait, they would have become the bastard sons of China a long time ago and some of them might even have met an early death. For them to now talk about pawns and bastard sons is not just a matter of sowing dissension between Taiwan and the US, it is also a matter of ingratitude.
Right now, who would like nothing more than a severing of ties between Taiwan and the US? Who is it who would dearly love to see an end to relations between Taiwan and Europe? China, of course. It is incomprehensible that these people undermine Taiwan while calling themselves Taiwanese.
Today, the US is Taiwan's most powerful ally. When China carried out military exercises aimed at Taiwan, even firing missiles over the island, other countries were afraid to say anything. It was the US that dispatched an aircraft carrier to put an end to China's provocations.
When China continues to expand its weapons arsenal in an attempt to attack Taiwan, European countries are afraid to sell arms to Taiwan and the US is the only one providing Taipei with new arms. The Taiwan Relations Act guarantees the relationship between the US and Taiwan. This guarantee is important for Tai-wan's security. What legislation have other countries passed?
In this situation, it is of course necessary to consider US interests as much as possible. As long as Boeing doesn't offer a ridiculously high price and as long as there aren't any major quality concerns over Boeing aircraft, Taiwan should buy from Boeing. This does not mean a severing of relations with France, however. As for violating WTO principles of "political intervention," isn't the Europeans' failure to sell arms to Taiwan also a form of political intervention?
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS