PFP Chairman James Soong (
During President Chen Shui-bian's (
With respect to Vice President Annette Lu's (呂秀蓮) vacation in Indonesia, Soong commented that "[Lu] broke no ice, but instead caused an avalanche."
Why must Soong maliciously criticize the efforts of the president and the vice president to make diplomatic breakthroughs? He is obviously going against the mainstream popular opinion in Taiwan and possibly digging a grave for his own political career in the process. Such mean-spirited talk can win only boos, rather than applause. After all, if one day he is elected leader of this country, won't he need to visit those same places? Won't he need to attempt diplomatic breakthroughs? Or perhaps he prefer to sit idly by while China continues in its attempts to isolate Taiwan?
It is precisely because of individuals such as Soong that Lu's plans to travel to Indonesia were prematurely leaked. Not only was Lu's plan spoiled, but the advance notice gave China time to launch a diplomatic assault to try and blockade her. Any civil servant who is proven to have leaked the information should face prosecution for disclosing confidential information. Such reckless disregard for national interest and destructive behavior make them China's best allies. With their help, China can easily make Taiwan surrender without resorting to military force.
Taiwan's foreign affairs, military and intelligence units are all the same. They were under strict control of the Chiang Kai-shek (
The change of ruling party merely changed the senior officials and ministry heads. Lower level civil servants remain untouched and staunchly loyal to the KMT. Under the circumstances, how can a DPP minister ensure that his subordinates, who are more than likely members of the opposition camp, will seriously implement his policies and orders?
The Chen administration has faced many roadblocks during its two years in office. One reason is that there are simply too many "professional eulogizers" such as Soong and KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Taiwan's society is split over the question of national identity and loyalty. In view of Soong's behavior, how can one hopes to establish an community consciousness? If such politicians are elected president, it will be a real sorrow for the people of Taiwan.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS