PFP Chairman James Soong (
During President Chen Shui-bian's (
With respect to Vice President Annette Lu's (呂秀蓮) vacation in Indonesia, Soong commented that "[Lu] broke no ice, but instead caused an avalanche."
Why must Soong maliciously criticize the efforts of the president and the vice president to make diplomatic breakthroughs? He is obviously going against the mainstream popular opinion in Taiwan and possibly digging a grave for his own political career in the process. Such mean-spirited talk can win only boos, rather than applause. After all, if one day he is elected leader of this country, won't he need to visit those same places? Won't he need to attempt diplomatic breakthroughs? Or perhaps he prefer to sit idly by while China continues in its attempts to isolate Taiwan?
It is precisely because of individuals such as Soong that Lu's plans to travel to Indonesia were prematurely leaked. Not only was Lu's plan spoiled, but the advance notice gave China time to launch a diplomatic assault to try and blockade her. Any civil servant who is proven to have leaked the information should face prosecution for disclosing confidential information. Such reckless disregard for national interest and destructive behavior make them China's best allies. With their help, China can easily make Taiwan surrender without resorting to military force.
Taiwan's foreign affairs, military and intelligence units are all the same. They were under strict control of the Chiang Kai-shek (
The change of ruling party merely changed the senior officials and ministry heads. Lower level civil servants remain untouched and staunchly loyal to the KMT. Under the circumstances, how can a DPP minister ensure that his subordinates, who are more than likely members of the opposition camp, will seriously implement his policies and orders?
The Chen administration has faced many roadblocks during its two years in office. One reason is that there are simply too many "professional eulogizers" such as Soong and KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Taiwan's society is split over the question of national identity and loyalty. In view of Soong's behavior, how can one hopes to establish an community consciousness? If such politicians are elected president, it will be a real sorrow for the people of Taiwan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS