It is risible that Jiang Zemin (
It is likely that during the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) 16th National Congress the "Three Represents Theory" will be enshrined alongside the reigning political dogma of Mao Zedong (
Essentially, Jiang has asserted that the CCP should recognize the need to broaden its power base by expanding beyond its traditional supporters among the bureaucrats, peasants and the working class. This means that the emergent middle class consisting of business owners and white-collar workers should be included.
This is pretty mild stuff to anyone who is from Planet Earth and living in the 21st Century! In fact, it is embarrassingly banal. Jiang's small-minded "theory" is being passed off as great thinking and is being treated as a breakthrough in Marxist governance. Yet it is little more than a simple notion that the party should represent "advanced productive forces, advanced culture and the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people". This unremarkable set of notions is little more than a ploy to justify continued Communist rule while embracing the market economy.
In all events, there is little in it all that would surprise anyone with a modicum of knowledge of democracy. Most other East Asian governments except North Korea have embraced a much more ambitious version of pluralistic democracy. Even if such "ideals" become firmly entrenched, Beijing's system of governance will remain distantly primitive to that practiced in Taiwan.
Although limited by law to two terms, doubts remain that Jiang will go quietly despite the fact that a successor has already been anointed, albeit unofficially. Either way, the ongoing campaign that trumpets Jiang's contribution is meant to promote his influence whether he steps aside or chooses to accept a spontaneous acclaim for his continuation at the helm.
Given the retarded and repressed condition of China's political culture, a potential power struggle would not bode well for stability in the Middle Kingdom. It is well known that every major period of instability in the recent past was prompted by internal struggles to secure sinecures and power instead of battling over the ideological soul of the party. And so as a transfer of political power looms, it is not surprising that intrigues are being played out in the shadows of the halls of Zhongnanhai and will continue within the confines of the summer resort of Beidaihe.
With the upcoming political succession drawing attention, Communist leaders are trying to make the party a more inclusive autocracy. By broadening the party's popular base by including entrepreneurs and letting them make money, the Communist Party expects to remain in a unchallenged position of power.
While bereft of its communist ideology to validate its continued dominance, the Party has no intention to relinquish or reduce its grip on political power. Similarly, Jiang's proteges and flacks do not wish to see his or their position to be diminished. And so they are likely to push for the "Three Represents" to become part of the party constitution to consolidate Jiang's continued influence.
From the standpoint of the survival of the CCP, there is a need to shore up a weakening foundation. After two decades of free-market reforms have given rise to a small private sector and increased personal freedoms, there are various forces that threaten party dominance.
This also includes the effect of expanded links to globalized markets that will further weaken centralized authority. But please, give us something that reflects a modicum of political maturity rather than the infantile "discovery" of the truths held in the "Three Represents."
In all events, the Communist Party and its cadres represent a retrograde force that is holding back China's political development and modernization. Like an obstinate old bull, they are standing in the middle of a flowing stream making muddy and blocking what would otherwise be clear water with an obvious forward course.
Their insistence upon continued dominance of the political landscape denigrates China's great cultural heritage and serves as an embarrassment to Chinese everywhere.
Christopher Lingle is professor of economics at Universidad Francisco Marroquin in Guatemala and global strategist for eConoLytics.com.
Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention. If it makes headlines, it is because China wants to invade. Yet, those who find their way here by some twist of fate often fall in love. If you ask them why, some cite numbers showing it is one of the freest and safest countries in the world. Others talk about something harder to name: The quiet order of queues, the shared umbrellas for anyone caught in the rain, the way people stand so elderly riders can sit, the
Taiwan’s fall would be “a disaster for American interests,” US President Donald Trump’s nominee for undersecretary of defense for policy Elbridge Colby said at his Senate confirmation hearing on Tuesday last week, as he warned of the “dramatic deterioration of military balance” in the western Pacific. The Republic of China (Taiwan) is indeed facing a unique and acute threat from the Chinese Communist Party’s rising military adventurism, which is why Taiwan has been bolstering its defenses. As US Senator Tom Cotton rightly pointed out in the same hearing, “[although] Taiwan’s defense spending is still inadequate ... [it] has been trending upwards
Small and medium enterprises make up the backbone of Taiwan’s economy, yet large corporations such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) play a crucial role in shaping its industrial structure, economic development and global standing. The company reported a record net profit of NT$374.68 billion (US$11.41 billion) for the fourth quarter last year, a 57 percent year-on-year increase, with revenue reaching NT$868.46 billion, a 39 percent increase. Taiwan’s GDP last year was about NT$24.62 trillion, according to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, meaning TSMC’s quarterly revenue alone accounted for about 3.5 percent of Taiwan’s GDP last year, with the company’s
There is nothing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) could do to stop the tsunami-like mass recall campaign. KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) reportedly said the party does not exclude the option of conditionally proposing a no-confidence vote against the premier, which the party later denied. Did an “actuary” like Chu finally come around to thinking it should get tough with the ruling party? The KMT says the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is leading a minority government with only a 40 percent share of the vote. It has said that the DPP is out of touch with the electorate, has proposed a bloated
RSS