The Ministry of National Defense yesterday released its White Paper on the country's national defense. The report is the sixth of its kind; the ministry began a tradition of issuing such analyses biennially in 1992. So speculation about the motive and timing of the paper's release, which coincided with the loss of another diplomatic ally and President Chen Shui-bian's (
The White Paper has a new emphasis that ought to ease any speculation about malice on the part of the government -- it stresses that the duty of the armed forces is to maintain peace of the country and the region and engage in so-called preventive war. This is a departure from the traditional emphasis on the readiness and eagerness of the military to fight and attack for a full victory.
This shift reflects Taiwan's own transformation from the days when the KMT regime had the entire country daydreaming of retaking "the mainland." China and Taiwan are two sovereign countries. All the government and the people of Taiwan want is to have the country's sovereignty respected and their democratic and free way of life preserved. This shift in theme is also consistent with the understanding between the US and Taiwan with regard to sales of defensive weapons to Taipei.
Another shift apparent in the White Paper is the new emphasis on high-tech arms and warfare. For the first time, superiority in information and electronic warfare is listed as one of the military's fundamental aims. The report also elaborated on the electronic and information warfare forces for the first time in the section where it introduced the armed services. This shift underscores a realization that sophisticated high-tech weapons may be the only military edge that Taiwan has over China. It is certainly no match in terms of the size of the two militaries. In case of attack, Taiwan will have to rely on this edge to maintain sea and air control until military aid from the US arrives.
How much longer can Taiwan enjoy this edge is unknown. The nation is at the mercy of its key ally, the US, when it comes to acquiring high-tech weaponry and China is catching up fast. With its new-found wealth China is spending an increasingly large amount on its military budget.
For the first time in a White Paper, the defense ministry has called for the establishment of cross-strait "military mutual confidence mechanisms," ranging from a hot line between the leaders of the two sides to demilitarized and military buffer zones, and an end to military exercises targeting the other side. The first two mechanisms are in particularly praiseworthy, as the former would surely reduce the chances of misunderstanding and miscommunication, while the latter would virtually eliminate the possibility of military confrontation in Taiwan Strait. Unfortunately, neither appear likely to become a reality any time soon. The third mechanism also appears to be a fantasy, since it is unlikely that China will stop targeting Taiwan, either with its military exercises or its deployment of ballistic missiles.
Overall, the new White Paper deserves a thumbs-up for its display of pragmatism and goodwill toward China.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS