Beijing delivered a rather nasty gift to President Chen Shui-bian (
The timing of the Beijing-Nauru deal was a deliberate slap in the face to Chen. Seeking US$130 million in aid, President Rene Harris went to Hong Kong without discussing the matter with his Cabinet and signed the communique with a deputy Chinese foreign minister. The announcement of the communique was timed to coincide with Chen's assumption of the DPP chairmanship. Beijing also made a point of inviting reporters from Taiwan to the press conference.
Chen's condemnation of such tacky behavior was correct. However, the whole affair is a reminder that it is time that the government end its fixation about the number of allies. It is also time for Taiwan to stay aloof from a "price war" with Beijing over diplomatic ties. If friendship between countries is built on money and aid projects instead of shared values and sympathies, then even if the government manages to salvage ties by outbidding Beijing, it will still have lost. Such ties will be about as permanent as sand castles on a beach.
Losing a diplomatic ally is embarrassing. But Nauru's defection is unlikely to trigger a domino effect. Since Taiwan has done nothing to hurt the friendship in the process of the Beijing-Nauru deal, neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the people of Taiwan need to blame themselves. After all, formal ties are not the only index for diplomacy. Trade and economic relations, interaction between peoples and cultural exchanges are all part of the multi-layered relationship between countries. It makes no sense to waste state resources competing for numbers.
In his inaugural speech as DPP chairman on Sunday, Chen said Taiwan "should seriously think about going our own way, walking our own Taiwan path and working out Taiwan's own future if our goodwill receives no reciprocal response from China." Most people in Taiwan understand what he meant and agree with his position, especially in the face of China's malicious diplomatic activities. The only people who don't understand apparently are KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Nauru faces enormous financial and environmental difficulties. The central Pacific island nation is one of many that are particularly vulnerable to global warming. As its former president Kinza Clodumar so eloquently pointed at the 1997 UN conference on global warming, Nauru's rain forests and 80 percent of its land have been destroyed by phosphate mining and its people are confined to a narrow coastal fringe that is just 2m above sea level. While sympathetic to Nauru's plight, Taiwan simply can't provide more aid. However, the Nauru government should understand that its value to China is largely as a weapon to attack Taiwan and embarrass Chen. Now that this goal has been achieved, Beijing is quite likely to shelve Nauru and the promises of further financial aid may go down like a rock in the ocean. Abandoning a friendship of more than 20 years for a stash of cash may provide some short-term relief, but the long-term damages could be quite severe.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS