Beijing delivered a rather nasty gift to President Chen Shui-bian (
The timing of the Beijing-Nauru deal was a deliberate slap in the face to Chen. Seeking US$130 million in aid, President Rene Harris went to Hong Kong without discussing the matter with his Cabinet and signed the communique with a deputy Chinese foreign minister. The announcement of the communique was timed to coincide with Chen's assumption of the DPP chairmanship. Beijing also made a point of inviting reporters from Taiwan to the press conference.
Chen's condemnation of such tacky behavior was correct. However, the whole affair is a reminder that it is time that the government end its fixation about the number of allies. It is also time for Taiwan to stay aloof from a "price war" with Beijing over diplomatic ties. If friendship between countries is built on money and aid projects instead of shared values and sympathies, then even if the government manages to salvage ties by outbidding Beijing, it will still have lost. Such ties will be about as permanent as sand castles on a beach.
Losing a diplomatic ally is embarrassing. But Nauru's defection is unlikely to trigger a domino effect. Since Taiwan has done nothing to hurt the friendship in the process of the Beijing-Nauru deal, neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the people of Taiwan need to blame themselves. After all, formal ties are not the only index for diplomacy. Trade and economic relations, interaction between peoples and cultural exchanges are all part of the multi-layered relationship between countries. It makes no sense to waste state resources competing for numbers.
In his inaugural speech as DPP chairman on Sunday, Chen said Taiwan "should seriously think about going our own way, walking our own Taiwan path and working out Taiwan's own future if our goodwill receives no reciprocal response from China." Most people in Taiwan understand what he meant and agree with his position, especially in the face of China's malicious diplomatic activities. The only people who don't understand apparently are KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Nauru faces enormous financial and environmental difficulties. The central Pacific island nation is one of many that are particularly vulnerable to global warming. As its former president Kinza Clodumar so eloquently pointed at the 1997 UN conference on global warming, Nauru's rain forests and 80 percent of its land have been destroyed by phosphate mining and its people are confined to a narrow coastal fringe that is just 2m above sea level. While sympathetic to Nauru's plight, Taiwan simply can't provide more aid. However, the Nauru government should understand that its value to China is largely as a weapon to attack Taiwan and embarrass Chen. Now that this goal has been achieved, Beijing is quite likely to shelve Nauru and the promises of further financial aid may go down like a rock in the ocean. Abandoning a friendship of more than 20 years for a stash of cash may provide some short-term relief, but the long-term damages could be quite severe.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS