Beijing delivered a rather nasty gift to President Chen Shui-bian (
The timing of the Beijing-Nauru deal was a deliberate slap in the face to Chen. Seeking US$130 million in aid, President Rene Harris went to Hong Kong without discussing the matter with his Cabinet and signed the communique with a deputy Chinese foreign minister. The announcement of the communique was timed to coincide with Chen's assumption of the DPP chairmanship. Beijing also made a point of inviting reporters from Taiwan to the press conference.
Chen's condemnation of such tacky behavior was correct. However, the whole affair is a reminder that it is time that the government end its fixation about the number of allies. It is also time for Taiwan to stay aloof from a "price war" with Beijing over diplomatic ties. If friendship between countries is built on money and aid projects instead of shared values and sympathies, then even if the government manages to salvage ties by outbidding Beijing, it will still have lost. Such ties will be about as permanent as sand castles on a beach.
Losing a diplomatic ally is embarrassing. But Nauru's defection is unlikely to trigger a domino effect. Since Taiwan has done nothing to hurt the friendship in the process of the Beijing-Nauru deal, neither the Ministry of Foreign Affairs nor the people of Taiwan need to blame themselves. After all, formal ties are not the only index for diplomacy. Trade and economic relations, interaction between peoples and cultural exchanges are all part of the multi-layered relationship between countries. It makes no sense to waste state resources competing for numbers.
In his inaugural speech as DPP chairman on Sunday, Chen said Taiwan "should seriously think about going our own way, walking our own Taiwan path and working out Taiwan's own future if our goodwill receives no reciprocal response from China." Most people in Taiwan understand what he meant and agree with his position, especially in the face of China's malicious diplomatic activities. The only people who don't understand apparently are KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Nauru faces enormous financial and environmental difficulties. The central Pacific island nation is one of many that are particularly vulnerable to global warming. As its former president Kinza Clodumar so eloquently pointed at the 1997 UN conference on global warming, Nauru's rain forests and 80 percent of its land have been destroyed by phosphate mining and its people are confined to a narrow coastal fringe that is just 2m above sea level. While sympathetic to Nauru's plight, Taiwan simply can't provide more aid. However, the Nauru government should understand that its value to China is largely as a weapon to attack Taiwan and embarrass Chen. Now that this goal has been achieved, Beijing is quite likely to shelve Nauru and the promises of further financial aid may go down like a rock in the ocean. Abandoning a friendship of more than 20 years for a stash of cash may provide some short-term relief, but the long-term damages could be quite severe.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS