President Chen Shui-bian (
The elevation of the party's status should have positive effects on the DPP as well as Chen's government. Mutual support and coordination will allow government and party reforms to better complement each other. The party can directly channel grassroots opinion to the party chairman, thereby bringing the policies of Chen's government much closer to what mainstream public opinion desires. Things the government can't do, due to policy restraints, can now be done within the party's framework.
The DPP has to move on from the revolutionary character it developed through past political struggles and become a more democratic party. Both concepts and practices must be changed. Political affairs and policy issues should be handled more practically while debates over ideology -- such as the "pro-independence" clause in the party charter -- should be pragmatically faced up to and defined.
The government and the DPP are now a single negotiating partner that Beijing can no longer ignore. Beijing has rebuffed the many goodwill gestures Chen has made since taking office and aimed more ballistic missiles at Taiwan. In May Chen offered to send a delegation led by the DPP's China affairs department chief to visit Beijing. With Chen as party chairman, this offer may be quickly realized.
Beijing has always insisted on "party-to-party" negotiations. Unlike the Chinese Communist Party or the KMT, the DPP does not have a tradition of a party-led government. However, as a political party the DPP can be more flexible than government agencies such as the Straits Exchange Foundation when it comes to breaking the impasse in cross-strait relations. If Beijing fails to take this opportunity to respond positively to an offer for talks, it must bear full blame.
Given the rancorous partisan atmosphere that constitutes Taiwan's politics, reconciliation is a forlorn hope, given that the opposition lacks the will to change their dynamics no matter what changes occur within the DPP. Their complaints about the DPP's actions or inactions have frequently appeared to be motivated by sour grapes rather than true social issues. The only way for the ruling party to bring the "pan-blue" camp to its knees is to build a legislative majority by attracting more opposition lawmakers.
Chen's assumption of the DPP's top office will inevitably lead to a realignment of the party's factions. The change in the factional structure within the party will also make the distribution of its resources more reasonable. It will also be conducive to campaign mobilization and the unified use of factional power.
The DPP's metamorphosis two years into Chen's term shows that the party has a higher capacity for soul-searching and change than its rivals. Hopefully, the DPP has learned from the KMT's errors and will not allow itself to become corrupt or complacent. The purpose of its reforms and progress is to revamp Taiwan's traditional political structure and build a new democratic culture.
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS