President Chen Shui-bian (
The elevation of the party's status should have positive effects on the DPP as well as Chen's government. Mutual support and coordination will allow government and party reforms to better complement each other. The party can directly channel grassroots opinion to the party chairman, thereby bringing the policies of Chen's government much closer to what mainstream public opinion desires. Things the government can't do, due to policy restraints, can now be done within the party's framework.
The DPP has to move on from the revolutionary character it developed through past political struggles and become a more democratic party. Both concepts and practices must be changed. Political affairs and policy issues should be handled more practically while debates over ideology -- such as the "pro-independence" clause in the party charter -- should be pragmatically faced up to and defined.
The government and the DPP are now a single negotiating partner that Beijing can no longer ignore. Beijing has rebuffed the many goodwill gestures Chen has made since taking office and aimed more ballistic missiles at Taiwan. In May Chen offered to send a delegation led by the DPP's China affairs department chief to visit Beijing. With Chen as party chairman, this offer may be quickly realized.
Beijing has always insisted on "party-to-party" negotiations. Unlike the Chinese Communist Party or the KMT, the DPP does not have a tradition of a party-led government. However, as a political party the DPP can be more flexible than government agencies such as the Straits Exchange Foundation when it comes to breaking the impasse in cross-strait relations. If Beijing fails to take this opportunity to respond positively to an offer for talks, it must bear full blame.
Given the rancorous partisan atmosphere that constitutes Taiwan's politics, reconciliation is a forlorn hope, given that the opposition lacks the will to change their dynamics no matter what changes occur within the DPP. Their complaints about the DPP's actions or inactions have frequently appeared to be motivated by sour grapes rather than true social issues. The only way for the ruling party to bring the "pan-blue" camp to its knees is to build a legislative majority by attracting more opposition lawmakers.
Chen's assumption of the DPP's top office will inevitably lead to a realignment of the party's factions. The change in the factional structure within the party will also make the distribution of its resources more reasonable. It will also be conducive to campaign mobilization and the unified use of factional power.
The DPP's metamorphosis two years into Chen's term shows that the party has a higher capacity for soul-searching and change than its rivals. Hopefully, the DPP has learned from the KMT's errors and will not allow itself to become corrupt or complacent. The purpose of its reforms and progress is to revamp Taiwan's traditional political structure and build a new democratic culture.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS