President Chen Shui-bian (
The elevation of the party's status should have positive effects on the DPP as well as Chen's government. Mutual support and coordination will allow government and party reforms to better complement each other. The party can directly channel grassroots opinion to the party chairman, thereby bringing the policies of Chen's government much closer to what mainstream public opinion desires. Things the government can't do, due to policy restraints, can now be done within the party's framework.
The DPP has to move on from the revolutionary character it developed through past political struggles and become a more democratic party. Both concepts and practices must be changed. Political affairs and policy issues should be handled more practically while debates over ideology -- such as the "pro-independence" clause in the party charter -- should be pragmatically faced up to and defined.
The government and the DPP are now a single negotiating partner that Beijing can no longer ignore. Beijing has rebuffed the many goodwill gestures Chen has made since taking office and aimed more ballistic missiles at Taiwan. In May Chen offered to send a delegation led by the DPP's China affairs department chief to visit Beijing. With Chen as party chairman, this offer may be quickly realized.
Beijing has always insisted on "party-to-party" negotiations. Unlike the Chinese Communist Party or the KMT, the DPP does not have a tradition of a party-led government. However, as a political party the DPP can be more flexible than government agencies such as the Straits Exchange Foundation when it comes to breaking the impasse in cross-strait relations. If Beijing fails to take this opportunity to respond positively to an offer for talks, it must bear full blame.
Given the rancorous partisan atmosphere that constitutes Taiwan's politics, reconciliation is a forlorn hope, given that the opposition lacks the will to change their dynamics no matter what changes occur within the DPP. Their complaints about the DPP's actions or inactions have frequently appeared to be motivated by sour grapes rather than true social issues. The only way for the ruling party to bring the "pan-blue" camp to its knees is to build a legislative majority by attracting more opposition lawmakers.
Chen's assumption of the DPP's top office will inevitably lead to a realignment of the party's factions. The change in the factional structure within the party will also make the distribution of its resources more reasonable. It will also be conducive to campaign mobilization and the unified use of factional power.
The DPP's metamorphosis two years into Chen's term shows that the party has a higher capacity for soul-searching and change than its rivals. Hopefully, the DPP has learned from the KMT's errors and will not allow itself to become corrupt or complacent. The purpose of its reforms and progress is to revamp Taiwan's traditional political structure and build a new democratic culture.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS