China's Vice Foreign Minister Wang Yi (
As a WTO member, Taiwan has every right to negotiate and enter into trade agreements with other WTO members. The organization permits various types of regional economic integrations, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the EU's customs union, because they further the WTO's long-term goal of global free trade. For example, in the case of an FTA, participants must eliminate all import tariffs on goods imported from other participants.
Multi-lateral and bi-lateral economic integration efforts are on the rise among WTO members. Between 1948 and 1994, the WTO's predecessor, the GATT, received 124 notifications of regional trade agreements. Since the WTO came into existence in 1995, it has been notified of over 100 other arrangements covering trade in goods or services. Taiwan is simply the latest member to seek the benefits offered by such arrangements.
Given its export-oriented economy, Taiwan has ample incentive to seek FTAs with not just the US, but with Japan, Singapore, Panama and many other nations. FTAs will allow Taiwanese goods to enter other signatory countries free of import tariffs, strengthening the ability of the goods to compete in those markets. Regional trade integration offers a host of other benefits as well, including the efficient re-allocation of resources and manpower due to the operation of market mechanisms, increased investment and technology transfers from other signatory countries.
Even more importantly for Taiwan is the "trade diversification" effect that will result from the signing of FTAs with countries such as the US. Putting aside the issue of the political and military threats posed by China, it is utterly foolish for Taiwan to skew its trade and investment disproportionally toward any one country. Last year alone, Taiwanese businesses invested as much as US$3.14 billion in China, a 33 percent increase over the previous year. FTAs with other nations would help steer investment to other countries.
The US has said it views FTAs strictly as an economic issue and that there is no need to complicate a simple matter. Beijing has, of course, accused Taiwan of having political agenda in seeking to sign a FTA with Washington. If seeking economic survival and prosperity is considered a political agenda, then participants of every other regional economic integrations, are also guilty, including China.
Just last month, Shi Guangsheng (
Now that China has made its threats, it will be interesting to see which countries succumb to its arm-twisting.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS