China's Vice Foreign Minister Wang Yi (
As a WTO member, Taiwan has every right to negotiate and enter into trade agreements with other WTO members. The organization permits various types of regional economic integrations, such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the EU's customs union, because they further the WTO's long-term goal of global free trade. For example, in the case of an FTA, participants must eliminate all import tariffs on goods imported from other participants.
Multi-lateral and bi-lateral economic integration efforts are on the rise among WTO members. Between 1948 and 1994, the WTO's predecessor, the GATT, received 124 notifications of regional trade agreements. Since the WTO came into existence in 1995, it has been notified of over 100 other arrangements covering trade in goods or services. Taiwan is simply the latest member to seek the benefits offered by such arrangements.
Given its export-oriented economy, Taiwan has ample incentive to seek FTAs with not just the US, but with Japan, Singapore, Panama and many other nations. FTAs will allow Taiwanese goods to enter other signatory countries free of import tariffs, strengthening the ability of the goods to compete in those markets. Regional trade integration offers a host of other benefits as well, including the efficient re-allocation of resources and manpower due to the operation of market mechanisms, increased investment and technology transfers from other signatory countries.
Even more importantly for Taiwan is the "trade diversification" effect that will result from the signing of FTAs with countries such as the US. Putting aside the issue of the political and military threats posed by China, it is utterly foolish for Taiwan to skew its trade and investment disproportionally toward any one country. Last year alone, Taiwanese businesses invested as much as US$3.14 billion in China, a 33 percent increase over the previous year. FTAs with other nations would help steer investment to other countries.
The US has said it views FTAs strictly as an economic issue and that there is no need to complicate a simple matter. Beijing has, of course, accused Taiwan of having political agenda in seeking to sign a FTA with Washington. If seeking economic survival and prosperity is considered a political agenda, then participants of every other regional economic integrations, are also guilty, including China.
Just last month, Shi Guangsheng (
Now that China has made its threats, it will be interesting to see which countries succumb to its arm-twisting.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS