In the past when Taiwan's diplomatic personnel returned to Taipei for routine consultations, they behaved as if they were vacationing. They wined and dined, filling up their stomachs while emptying out their heads, before going abroad again. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs recently changed this practice. The ministry rounded up all of its diplomats back in town for routine consultations and herded them into one-week seminars. The diplomats heard some tough talk from Secretary-General of the Presidential Office Chen Shih-meng (
Diplomacy is challenging work to begin with. Due to Taiwan's unique circumstances, enhanced flexibility is needed. But the foreign ministry is plagued by conservativism. Personnel who came up through the ranks under the KMT administration have proven to be stumbling blocks to the DPP's diplomatic efforts. Given that the bulk of the diplomats' work overseas involves dealing with visitors from Taiwan, newcomers quickly lose their enthusiasm. How can individuals with this kind of morale and mentality handle the intensive diplomatic combat needed to counteract China's efforts to constrain Taiwan?
Two years ago the people chose a new navigator, who has taken the country in a new direction. But the ministry's personnel have not kept pace. As a result, the Presidential Office is bypassing the ministry and giving the responsibility for overseeing some foreign affairs to the National Security Council. Actually, the Chen administration is following former president Lee Teng-hui's (
Breaking down the out-dated foreign-affairs mentality is key for the DPP. China is central to Taiwan's diplomacy. Chen Shih-meng's statement that "the two sides of Taiwan Strait are not Siamese twins, but fraternal twins" neatly summed up the historical ties and the independent sovereignties of the two sides of the Strait. His comment should also serve as a wake-up call to those diplomatic personnel blinded by the "Great China" myth.
Given the disparity in their sizes, Taiwan will surely lose out to China under traditional rules. So any hope of victory can only come through unconventional means, the kind of street-fighting strategy the DPP used to beat the KMT. Chiou was the mastermind of the those strategies. He advocates an offensive strategy, more overseas travel by senior ministers -- who face less restrictions than the president, vice president or premier -- and standing up for Taiwan's rights. Only through such methods can Taiwan avoid the kind of bullying it has been subjected to at APEC and the UN in the past.
But an even more fundamental problem hampering diplomacy is a lack of agreement on a national identity and the unification-independence debate. Taiwan's political parties have all demonstrated an inability to place national interests above their own. PFP Chairman James Soong (
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS