Another tempest in a teapot, more political hypocrisy -- has there ever been a politician in Taiwan willing to stand on principles when their personal interests are challenged?
Former interior minister Chang Po-ya (
Newspapers and TV call-in shows pounced on the story, turning their guns on the DPP and TSU. The accusations from Chang and people like KMT Legislator Li Chia-chin (
However, Chang and Li were not so willing to tell their stories once prosecutors launched an investigation. Both played hide-and-seek with prosecutors for several days -- until the prosecutors threatened to ask the courts to issue summons to them. When Chang and Li finally showed up at the Taipei District Prosecutors' Office on Wednesday, they had changed their stories, saying that they had merely overheard allegations of vote-buying. After leaving the prosecutors' office Chang told reporters that she had never said she saw people buying or selling votes inside the legislature. She had only said "one of us" had seen it. Li, in turn, said his responsibility was only to blow the whistle and that looking for evidence was the prosecutor's job.
Such irresponsible sophistry and groundless claims are not just ludicrous -- they are libelous. Chang has seriously damaged her career with this mud-slinging vendetta. If she has an axe to grind, it should be with the opposition parties which had promised to support her nomination. Chang lost, by one vote, because both the KMT and the PFP banned their lawmakers from the legislative floor that day to prevent them from voting for Yao.
As an independent, Chang's political career has always been a balancing act between the DPP and the KMT. Chang's political support stems largely from the admiration and respect for her mother, Hsu Shih-hsien (
How disappointing to see how low Hsu's daughter has fallen that she would stoop to such slander. It would appear that her years of power and privilege have gone to her head. The public has learned to expect little more than such outlandish comments from KMT politicians and lawmakers, but such actions should be condemned nevertheless. The same can't be said of Chang. Both Chang and Li should publicly apologize for their false accusations and for creating yet another divisive scandal.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
Taiwan no longer wants to merely manufacture the chips that power artificial intelligence (AI). It aims to build the software, platforms and services that run on them. Ten major AI infrastructure projects, a national cloud computing center in Tainan, the sovereign language model Trustworthy AI Dialogue Engine, five targeted industry verticals — from precision medicine to smart agriculture — and the goal of ranking among the world’s top five in computing power by 2040: The roadmap from “Silicon Island” to “Smart Island” is drawn. The question is whether the western plains, where population, industry and farmland are concentrated, have the water and
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
RSS