The government has decided to completely take over the China Aviation Development Founda-tion (CADF,
The CADF board will be chaired by Minister of Transportation and Communications Lin Ling-san (林陵三) and vice ministers from other relevant government agencies will serve as board members. The Executive Yuan has also asked the CADF to sell its CAL shares by the end of next year -- effectively privatizing the company -- and then dissolve itself. While the government deserves credit for the effort it is putting into CAL's problems, there is still a need for caution if ethical problems surrounding the takeover process and share sales are to be avoided.
First of all, there is the problem presented by the fact that one of the players is doubling as referee. The transportation ministry is in charge of the Civil Aeronautics Administration (CAA), which is responsible for supervising flight safety among the airlines, including CAL. Now we have the transportation minister doubling as the chairman of CAL's biggest shareholder. Before the CADF has dissolved, it will be difficult for the CAA to instruct the company to improve flight safety.
Even though the minister has said that the foundation will not interfere in the company's operations and will only work on the shares sale, it is in fact difficult to separate equity sales from operations. The fact that CAL's chairman and president are both mem-bers of the CADF board creates confusion and could cause other disputes in the future.
Next, the CADF's board members and supervisors are all government officials, but the government's interests are not necessarily synonymous with the interests of the airlines' shareholders, much less those of CAL employees. The way in which the government avoids possible conflicts of interest surrounding the sharea sale will be a mark of its wisdom. The ministry has said that CAL will not become a "foreign" company, implying that foreign airlines will not be entitled to acquire any of the company's shares.
But EVA Airways is Taiwan's only other international airline. If CAL's shares are simply sold to EVA, that will drastically change the competitive balance in Taiwan's aviation industry -- not a good thing for passengers, CAL employees or even EVA.
First, it will leave Taiwan with one huge international airline holding a monopoly. Foreign airlines will still be around, of course, but most Taiwanese travel with Taiwanese airlines. If CAL and EVA become one, we can expect persistently high ticket prices and the quality of service may even deteriorate. This is the kind of inefficiency created by monopolies.
Second, for a long time, there has been intense competition between CAL and EVA, as well as between employees of the two companies. If EVA becomes China Airlines' boss, CAL employees will be demoralized. If that happens, the tide of people leaving their jobs will likely be even greater than the current exodus prompted by CAL's recent tragedy, further diminishing its competitiveness.
Third, CAL and EVA are vastly different in terms of organizational culture. A merger with EVA will not benefit CAL. Moreover, the impact on EVA of such a merger would probably be even greater than that on China Airlines because EVA has existed for only a little over 10 years. In their assessment of proposed mergers, people in the industry often
consider compatibility of organizational cultures to be the most important factor. When two people are incompatible, yet are forced together by their parents, one can expect that the ensuing marriage will not be a happy one.
It is difficult to understand why the transportation ministry, prior to any detailed discussion by the CADF board -- and without enlisting the opinions of a wide variety of experts -- said that it would not allow foreign businesses to buy China Airlines stock. Was it because the government didn't want to let a domestic company pass into foreign hands, or was there some more convincing reason for the announcement? The ministry must make this clear. If, on the one hand, it says that foreign teams will be brought in to improve CAL's air safety, its unwillingness on the other hand to sell off stock to foreign airlines would seem contradictory.
Nevertheless, I support the government's decision to reform CAL. I also hope that the airline will be privatized soon and that its many "in-laws" who have thus far made effective reforms impossible will be removed. I maintain, however, that, looking at the list of CADF directors announced by the government, there certainly remains a conflict of interest. How this crisis can be turned into an opportunity -- and China Airlines be given a chance to be reborn so that people are no longer afraid to fly with it -- will depend on the wisdom of the government.
Gao Jyh-peng is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Francis Huang and Scudder Smith
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS