The KMT's campaign is often no match for its opponents when it comes to drawing voters' attention in this so-called "media age." Nevertheless, there is an exception -- the one and only Taipei City Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
With his charming face and pleasant personality, Ma beat then mayor Chen Shui-bian (
Trailing behind Ma in all recent public polls, Lee faces a tough fight as an underdog. In fact, Ma enjoys an overwhelming lead over any potential DPP candidate.
However, this does not ensure Ma's victory. He may have enjoyed a consistently high approval rating over the past three years, but his teammates in the city government have a lot of catching up to do. In other words, the Ma administration as a whole might become the stumbling block for the mayor himself.
The city government's poor handling of the crackdown on the sex industry and rampant police corruption has had a devastating effect on Ma. The city's slow response to the flood caused by Typhoon Nari last summer also displayed a lack of crisis-management capability. Unlike Chen's administration, Ma's team is not competitive in responding to the public's needs.
In the past two mayoral elections in Taipei, Chen won on average 40 percent of the vote. The DPP is quite confident that Lee could secure at least the same number of votes from the so-called "pan green" camp. Add to this the fact that Chen, as president, and the DPP will be standing united behind Lee.
The candidate's personality is another key. As a Harvard graduate and the holder of a doctorate, Lee has received praise for his distinguished education background and international vision, two advantages he shares with Ma. Though Lee doesn't come from Taipei, his professional experiences as a legislator, a diplomat and an executive
official would be important factors to voters.
Most importantly, Lee is a fighter, not a quitter. He's the kind of guy who is enthusiastic, aggressive, sanguine and, best of all, down to earth. Soon after his nomination was confirmed, he described his race with Ma as a "gentlemen's competition." The truth is, there is no way for an election in Taiwan to be "gentle."
Since Taipei has the largest number of middle-class voters, the extent to which Lee could attract these moderate voters would decide the result of the election. Under the circumstances, being aggressive, but not nasty, is the rule to follow in the campaign.
As the challenger, Lee should first raise the issues for debate and then present his views on these issues, so that the voters would have concrete information with which to make their decision. Lee should ask Taipei voters the following questions: "Are you better off than you were four years ago? Aren't you worried that your cars will float away in the next flood? Are you happy with the environment in which you live and with the underground brothels that are still running?"
In any given context, being aggressive helps one to push issues that reflect most favorably upon you. Next, get ready to launch a tug of war -- find out what went wrong with the city government in the last three years and strike at it with force and determination.
Some have portrayed the Tai-pei mayoral election as a prelude for the 2004 presidential election. It might not have a direct impact on Chen's re-election, but it definitely warrants close observation.
Liu Kuan-teh is a Taipei-based political commentator.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS