Culture and safety
Jing Hung-sying's (景鴻鑫) com-mentary, ("Aviation safety is a question of culture," May 31, page 12), speaks at length about the role of culture conflict as being a primary factor for China Airline's pitiful aviation safety record. He suggests that the National Science Council "coordinate collaborative efforts on the part of academia and industry to improve the compatibility between Western aviation technology and Taiwan's culture and society."
As we observe, EVA airlines has a fine aviation safety record. Other than simply impaneling another committee from academia and industry, perhaps the enigmatic "powers that be" should swiftly act on the recommendation of previous committees and hasten China Airlines privatization.
If "culture" is primarily responsible for China Airlines' state of affairs, in the interim, the company might consider such heretical notions as developing case studies based on EVA airlines, requesting its assistance, or consider attracting EVA talent as a means to overhaul its performance -- actions any responsible author-ity would seriously consider.
Stephen E. Hoover
Miaoli
Jing Hung-sying is exactly right in attributing safety to culture. In another high-risk industry -- nuclear power -- a strong culture is directly correlated with improvements in, and maintenance of safe operations. In the US we use a Culture Index to determine the degree to which an organization has a strong safety culture. This index is highly correlated to positive
regulatory assessments, reductions in human error and overall safe operations.
Components of the Culture Index include quantification of five key elements: strong mission and goals, simple work practices, solid knowledge and skills, a well-developed self-improvement program and effective internal communications. Jing's editorial touched on virtually all of these critical components -- operation and management, training, and "professional independence."
Dan Lyons
Chicago, Illinois
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS