Former DPP chairman Shih Ming-te's (
Dreaming of a Greater China and calling for direct links across the Taiwan Strait, Shih veered away from the DPP's political platform several years ago and he eventually left the party. Surely Shih's chances of winning in December are as slim as those of another former DPP chairman, Hsu Hsin-liang (
movement.
Politicians usually have a strong sense of mission as well as a strong desire for power. It is distressing, however, to see the almost suicidal inclinations of Taiwan's older generation of politicians, no matter what their ideology. In mature democracies, politicians are often take on a completely different role once they leave office -- Jimmy Carter's globetrotting for the Carter Center's programs for peace and better health around the world is a prime example. But for Taiwan's activists and politicians, politics is their lifeblood. A rare exception to the rule so far is former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (
The early opposition leaders paid a heavy price for their devotion to democracy. Shih spent more than two decades in prison because of the Kaohsiung Incident. Hsu was blacklisted by the KMT and forced into exile for more than a decade. But now most of the ideals they fought for for so long for have become reality and the party they struggled to build is now in power. Giving orders and engaging in conflict are part and parcel of their personalities, not following orders and coordinating with others. At odds with the current party leadership, they can only search for another battlefield.
But is not just Shih and Hsu who can't let go of politics. Former president Lee Teng-hui (
Shih's defeat in last year's legislative elections highlighted the gap between his views and those of the general public. His chances in the Kaohsiung mayoral race are even slimmer. Only the "pan blue" camp stands to benefit from the situation. It looks as if political ideals have lost out to personal grudges in Taiwanese politics once again.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS