President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent speech on Tatan Island prompted a response from China. Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), director of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, issued a press release, expressing the hope that Taiwan would authorize representatives from its business sector to negotiate with Beijing on the issue of direct links. Chen Yunlin even named two Taiwanese business leaders as candidates. Then a number of lawmakers and media figures in Taiwan also echoed Beijing's tune.
The two business leaders named by China immediately voiced their enthusiasm for the role and called for direct links within the framework of "one China, two systems."
Against this backdrop, the following aspects of the three links issue must be kept in mind.
First, China is waging a "soft propaganda war" through Taiwanese business leaders, media and politicians. True, Chen Yunlin's press release contained no strong "one China" rhetoric. But this merely reflects increased flexibility in China's strategy, designed to accomplish direct links prior to the forthcoming 16th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. Taiwan must under no circumstances believe China's stance on the "one China" policy is loosening.
Taiwanese businesspeople who shuttle across the Strait have become pawns in Beijing's efforts to push for unification by means of an economic siege of Taiwan. While Chen Yunlin did not personally mention "one China," the two "Taiwanese representatives" he mentioned felt no reluctance about doing so for him.
Second, it is imperative that the political significance of the direct links discussions be correctly interpreted. On the surface, Chen Yunlin's comments were a goodwill response to President Chen's Tatan speech. We must understand, however, China's urgent need to push for a commencement of direct links before the 16th National Congress.
President Chen stated three principles upon which Taiwan would negotiate through representatives from Taiwan's private sectors: Taiwan must not be dwarfed, localized or marginalized in the process. This is Taiwan's bottom line in response to China's increased flexibility, and the key point of President Chen's speech.
Third, the two sides must negotiate on an equal footing. A framework and channels for cross-strait negotiations have long existed. But China's attempts to degrade Taiwan's sovereignty and its continued boycott of Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF, 海基會) have rendered the channels and the framework dysfunctional. If China is sincere about establishing direct links, it must resume negotiations with the SEF out of consideration and respect for Taiwan. Why bother setting up another channel and delaying the establishment of the links in the process?
The invitation extended to representatives of Taiwan's business community and the failure to mention President Chen's "three principles" suggest deliberate attempts to blur the issues and ignore Taiwan's sovereignty. China's hope is that its "one China" policy will gradually achieve its goals. The government must never backtrack from its demand for negotiations on an equal footing.
Fourth, economic benefits must never be the sole motivation behind direct links. Direct links are about more than just economics. Leaving aside the national security issues, cross-strait links are suffused with political significance, especially given China's refusal to relinquish its "one China" principle. How to assert and protect Taiwan's sovereignty if direct links are established is an issue that Taiwan's government cannot ignore. The government must actively make strategy in accordance with President Chen's three principles. Otherwise, direct links will only fatten pro-China businesspeople at the expense of all Taiwanese.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS