President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁) recent speech on Tatan Island prompted a response from China. Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), director of China's Taiwan Affairs Office, issued a press release, expressing the hope that Taiwan would authorize representatives from its business sector to negotiate with Beijing on the issue of direct links. Chen Yunlin even named two Taiwanese business leaders as candidates. Then a number of lawmakers and media figures in Taiwan also echoed Beijing's tune.
The two business leaders named by China immediately voiced their enthusiasm for the role and called for direct links within the framework of "one China, two systems."
Against this backdrop, the following aspects of the three links issue must be kept in mind.
First, China is waging a "soft propaganda war" through Taiwanese business leaders, media and politicians. True, Chen Yunlin's press release contained no strong "one China" rhetoric. But this merely reflects increased flexibility in China's strategy, designed to accomplish direct links prior to the forthcoming 16th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party. Taiwan must under no circumstances believe China's stance on the "one China" policy is loosening.
Taiwanese businesspeople who shuttle across the Strait have become pawns in Beijing's efforts to push for unification by means of an economic siege of Taiwan. While Chen Yunlin did not personally mention "one China," the two "Taiwanese representatives" he mentioned felt no reluctance about doing so for him.
Second, it is imperative that the political significance of the direct links discussions be correctly interpreted. On the surface, Chen Yunlin's comments were a goodwill response to President Chen's Tatan speech. We must understand, however, China's urgent need to push for a commencement of direct links before the 16th National Congress.
President Chen stated three principles upon which Taiwan would negotiate through representatives from Taiwan's private sectors: Taiwan must not be dwarfed, localized or marginalized in the process. This is Taiwan's bottom line in response to China's increased flexibility, and the key point of President Chen's speech.
Third, the two sides must negotiate on an equal footing. A framework and channels for cross-strait negotiations have long existed. But China's attempts to degrade Taiwan's sovereignty and its continued boycott of Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF, 海基會) have rendered the channels and the framework dysfunctional. If China is sincere about establishing direct links, it must resume negotiations with the SEF out of consideration and respect for Taiwan. Why bother setting up another channel and delaying the establishment of the links in the process?
The invitation extended to representatives of Taiwan's business community and the failure to mention President Chen's "three principles" suggest deliberate attempts to blur the issues and ignore Taiwan's sovereignty. China's hope is that its "one China" policy will gradually achieve its goals. The government must never backtrack from its demand for negotiations on an equal footing.
Fourth, economic benefits must never be the sole motivation behind direct links. Direct links are about more than just economics. Leaving aside the national security issues, cross-strait links are suffused with political significance, especially given China's refusal to relinquish its "one China" principle. How to assert and protect Taiwan's sovereignty if direct links are established is an issue that Taiwan's government cannot ignore. The government must actively make strategy in accordance with President Chen's three principles. Otherwise, direct links will only fatten pro-China businesspeople at the expense of all Taiwanese.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
RSS