The controversy over former army commander Justin Lin (
According to a survey conducted by a Chinese-language newspaper in Taiwan, an overwhelming majority of people across party lines have found Lin's defection to be unforgivable and think that the government should prosecute him.
What is prompting this sudden unity? It has to do with the severity of Lin's alleged crime.
Lin's defection occurred while he was on active duty at a front line military installation at a time when this country was still living under martial law. While Lin was certainly not the first and not the last to defect, the damage he caused to this country's national security and dignity was devastating at the time.
Lin said that he was motivated by a desire to study and to do some good for those on the other side of the Taiwan Strait.
While these reasons seem to suggest no malice, Lin could have resigned from the army and then, as many others have done before and since his defection, enter China via a third country. What made Lin's act inexcusable was the manner in which he defected. In view of his egregious violation of the trust placed in him, Lin should understand the resentment that those in Taiwan feel toward him.
To the supporters of Taiwan independence, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are clearly two separate countries that remain politically and militarily hostile toward one another. In these people's eyes, Lin committed an act of treason by defecting to an enemy state. Their anger and disappointment is understandable.
But what about supporters of unification? Isn't China the sacred motherland they pine for? What compelling reasons do they have for taking offense at Lin's action?
The reason may reside in the fact that Lin's defection took place in 1979, while the KMT was still in power. To these people, Lin's grave sin was a betrayal of the KMT regime. Most, if not all, of these people fall into one of three groups -- those who retreated to Taiwan from China with the KMT, the descendants of the first group, or those successfully brainwashed by KMT propaganda. They have undying loyalty to the KMT, which in their heart will forever remain the only legitimate ROC government. Many of them now support unification because, to them, it is the next-best choice to KMT rule. Opposition lawmakers therefore strongly oppose Lin's return.
Interestingly, some lawmakers from the ruling party seem relatively sympathetic to Lin, which is surprising since one would expect exactly the opposite reaction, given the ongoing political animosity between China and Taiwan.
But, upon closer examination, it isn't difficult to understand the situation.
Despite Lin's noble explanation for his defection, his traitorous decision may have been prompted by his unhappiness with the status quo and a deep disappointment with the KMT regime. That is a sentiment that many political dissidents who have since become Taiwanese lawmakers may also share. But at the moment of truth, that sentiment caused Lin to defect to China while local lawmakers joined, at a great price, the Taiwan independence movement.
In view of the sensitive political issues and mixed feelings stirred up by the Lin case, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) decided to leave the matter in the hands of the law.
The rest of us need more time to ponder the implications of this incident. Hopefully, it will help Taiwanese develop a better sense of national identity.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS