Taiwanese are often described as people who "don't shed tears until they see a coffin." Only after a tragedy do they become aware of the harm caused by their usual heedlessness and then it is too late. What is even more unfortunate is the fact that they forget the lessons of the tragedy as soon as their tears dry, paving the way for an endless cycle of disaster, tears, recrimination and vows of reformation.
In two decades, China Airlines (CAL) has, on average, had a major accident every three and a half years. The China Aviation Development Foundation (CADF,
But China Airline's problems are not the result of recent changes -- they are the accumulation of over half a century of complacency and mismanagement. Only if the horrendous disaster last Saturday can actually bring about a thorough reform of the airline will there be a chance that tears will not be shed so frequently in the future.
It is not a question of just replacing the chairman or president. The real problem with CAL is its corporate culture and an organizational model that is a monstrous hybrid between government and private enterprise. Ever since its inception, China Airlines has grown alongside the ROC air force -- whose top brass get important positions in the company after they retire while fighter pilots almost automatically join the company after finishing their military careers.
As a result, the problems that exist as a result of the air force's hierarchy contaminate CAL's corporate culture. For example, air force flight crews consider themselves far superior to the maintenance personnel, who in turn feel above communications people. Military etiquette also stresses unswerving obedience to senior colleagues, as well as fostering a camaraderie that encourages people to help conceal each other's derelictions.
Naturally, such a corporate culture does not adapt very well to the pluralistic values of civilian society nor to profit-driven modern business concepts. China Airlines can't hope to make a comeback unless its militarized culture is fundamentally overhauled. The company needs to be thoroughly privatized and its personnel appointment system -- which has long acted as a channel for political reward -- should be thoroughly revamped. At the same time, the government should end its interference in the company and allow the infusion of modern management into the organizational structure.
There is no reason why the DPP government should shoulder the baggage from the KMT era lock, stock and barrel. There is no reason why the government shouldn't insist on a bold reform of CAL. The company must undergo public scrutiny and move toward normalization, systematization and professionalism.
Only then will the meaning and value of the 2000 political transition not be lost. Only then will we be spared the sorry sight of a pile of coffins -- as well as the tears shed for the victims -- every couple of years.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS