Taiwanese are often described as people who "don't shed tears until they see a coffin." Only after a tragedy do they become aware of the harm caused by their usual heedlessness and then it is too late. What is even more unfortunate is the fact that they forget the lessons of the tragedy as soon as their tears dry, paving the way for an endless cycle of disaster, tears, recrimination and vows of reformation.
In two decades, China Airlines (CAL) has, on average, had a major accident every three and a half years. The China Aviation Development Foundation (CADF,
But China Airline's problems are not the result of recent changes -- they are the accumulation of over half a century of complacency and mismanagement. Only if the horrendous disaster last Saturday can actually bring about a thorough reform of the airline will there be a chance that tears will not be shed so frequently in the future.
It is not a question of just replacing the chairman or president. The real problem with CAL is its corporate culture and an organizational model that is a monstrous hybrid between government and private enterprise. Ever since its inception, China Airlines has grown alongside the ROC air force -- whose top brass get important positions in the company after they retire while fighter pilots almost automatically join the company after finishing their military careers.
As a result, the problems that exist as a result of the air force's hierarchy contaminate CAL's corporate culture. For example, air force flight crews consider themselves far superior to the maintenance personnel, who in turn feel above communications people. Military etiquette also stresses unswerving obedience to senior colleagues, as well as fostering a camaraderie that encourages people to help conceal each other's derelictions.
Naturally, such a corporate culture does not adapt very well to the pluralistic values of civilian society nor to profit-driven modern business concepts. China Airlines can't hope to make a comeback unless its militarized culture is fundamentally overhauled. The company needs to be thoroughly privatized and its personnel appointment system -- which has long acted as a channel for political reward -- should be thoroughly revamped. At the same time, the government should end its interference in the company and allow the infusion of modern management into the organizational structure.
There is no reason why the DPP government should shoulder the baggage from the KMT era lock, stock and barrel. There is no reason why the government shouldn't insist on a bold reform of CAL. The company must undergo public scrutiny and move toward normalization, systematization and professionalism.
Only then will the meaning and value of the 2000 political transition not be lost. Only then will we be spared the sorry sight of a pile of coffins -- as well as the tears shed for the victims -- every couple of years.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS