Despite being NT$60 million short of his financial goal, Lee Chin-ming (
As someone who hails from the area where the school is to be built and as someone who has worked in education, I would like to ask A-ming to please reconsider this matter. It's not too late for him to change his mind.
It has been popular in Taiwan in recent years to found universities and colleges. In central and southern Taiwan, most of these schools commonly lease land from Taiwan Sugar Corp (Taisugar,
The college that A-ming has planned and raised money for is located in Liuying township (
There are already more than 150 universities in Taiwan. Some private universities are in the midst of expanding, racing to beat each other to the top, struggling to create a lasting foundation before they run into trouble. The number of students is increasing and the schools continue to expand, regardless of whether the nation actually needs the new departments and the students they educate. National universities are also expanding, in keeping with the policy of one national university per city and county. Taking advantage of this, colleges are expanding in order to become universities.
But the situation for newly established schools appears to be different. No matter how much idealism they may generate, room for development tends to be tightly constricted. According to estimates given by the Cabinet-level Council for Economic Planning and Development, the number of elementary school students will decrease by 40 percent in the next 50 years, while the junior and senior high school student population will fall by 37 percent. The number of 18-to 21-year-olds will plummet by 50 percent.
Given these trends, existing universities -- already too many in number -- will experience increasing hardship. For those small schools out in the countryside, which lack the benefit of a stable foundation, the situation will likely be even worse.
Twenty years ago, when Japan's economy was still developing, many universities were established in that nation's countryside. Now, more than 500 of these schools are struggling to recruit students. Even attempts to recruit and retain students from China have been unsuccessful. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan.
Beginning in 1988, I served as an adviser to the Ministry of Education in the field of construction, during which time I frequently participated in investigations of schools that were either being established or expanded. When my term concluded in 1994, I became a member of an environmental impact assessment committee under the Environmental Protection Administration and have participated in impact assessments ever since.
During the last 15 years, I have seen just about every case that has arisen relating to the establishment of schools. In the beginning, I was happy to see new schools being built, hoping it would increase the overall population of people in higher education. But in recent years, because of considerations about the future population structure and the present capacity of universities, impact assessments on schools in more remote areas have often carried a warning, and a request to organizers that they reconsider. These warnings, however, have had little effect.
I headed the impact assessment work done on A-ming's proposed university. Upon surveying the site, I discovered that, despite not being legally registered, a large amount of nursery stock had already been grown, to be transplanted during the construction of the school.
I sensed, and could not help but admire, the founders' determination to establish their university. I therefore did not issue a warning. But now, after seeing media reports and seeing that A-ming is still having difficulty raising funds, I feel I really must add a note of caution.
The day for this kind of thing has already passed. I truly don't have the heart to watch the shambles I foresee actually come to pass. But if A-ming wants to take his hard-earned money and do something meaningful for young people in the countryside, he will still be able to fulfill his wish to make a contribution there -- and earn our respect for doing so.
Ouyang Chiao-fuei is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering at National Central University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday was handcuffed and escorted by police to the Taipei Detention Center, after the Taipei District Court ordered that he be detained and held incommunicado for suspected corruption during his tenure as Taipei mayor. The ruling reversed an earlier decision by the same court on Monday last week that ordered Ko’s release without bail. That decision was appealed by prosecutors on Wednesday, leading the High Court to conclude that Ko had been “actively involved” in the alleged corruption and it ordered the district court to hold a second detention hearing. Video clips
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je’s (柯文哲) arrest is a significant development. He could have become president or vice president on a shared TPP-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket and could have stood again in 2028. If he is found guilty, there would be little chance of that, but what of his party? What about the third force in Taiwanese politics? What does this mean for the disenfranchised young people who he attracted, and what does it mean for his ambitious and ideologically fickle right-hand man, TPP caucus leader Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌)? Ko and Huang have been appealing to that