Despite being NT$60 million short of his financial goal, Lee Chin-ming (
As someone who hails from the area where the school is to be built and as someone who has worked in education, I would like to ask A-ming to please reconsider this matter. It's not too late for him to change his mind.
It has been popular in Taiwan in recent years to found universities and colleges. In central and southern Taiwan, most of these schools commonly lease land from Taiwan Sugar Corp (Taisugar,
The college that A-ming has planned and raised money for is located in Liuying township (
There are already more than 150 universities in Taiwan. Some private universities are in the midst of expanding, racing to beat each other to the top, struggling to create a lasting foundation before they run into trouble. The number of students is increasing and the schools continue to expand, regardless of whether the nation actually needs the new departments and the students they educate. National universities are also expanding, in keeping with the policy of one national university per city and county. Taking advantage of this, colleges are expanding in order to become universities.
But the situation for newly established schools appears to be different. No matter how much idealism they may generate, room for development tends to be tightly constricted. According to estimates given by the Cabinet-level Council for Economic Planning and Development, the number of elementary school students will decrease by 40 percent in the next 50 years, while the junior and senior high school student population will fall by 37 percent. The number of 18-to 21-year-olds will plummet by 50 percent.
Given these trends, existing universities -- already too many in number -- will experience increasing hardship. For those small schools out in the countryside, which lack the benefit of a stable foundation, the situation will likely be even worse.
Twenty years ago, when Japan's economy was still developing, many universities were established in that nation's countryside. Now, more than 500 of these schools are struggling to recruit students. Even attempts to recruit and retain students from China have been unsuccessful. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan.
Beginning in 1988, I served as an adviser to the Ministry of Education in the field of construction, during which time I frequently participated in investigations of schools that were either being established or expanded. When my term concluded in 1994, I became a member of an environmental impact assessment committee under the Environmental Protection Administration and have participated in impact assessments ever since.
During the last 15 years, I have seen just about every case that has arisen relating to the establishment of schools. In the beginning, I was happy to see new schools being built, hoping it would increase the overall population of people in higher education. But in recent years, because of considerations about the future population structure and the present capacity of universities, impact assessments on schools in more remote areas have often carried a warning, and a request to organizers that they reconsider. These warnings, however, have had little effect.
I headed the impact assessment work done on A-ming's proposed university. Upon surveying the site, I discovered that, despite not being legally registered, a large amount of nursery stock had already been grown, to be transplanted during the construction of the school.
I sensed, and could not help but admire, the founders' determination to establish their university. I therefore did not issue a warning. But now, after seeing media reports and seeing that A-ming is still having difficulty raising funds, I feel I really must add a note of caution.
The day for this kind of thing has already passed. I truly don't have the heart to watch the shambles I foresee actually come to pass. But if A-ming wants to take his hard-earned money and do something meaningful for young people in the countryside, he will still be able to fulfill his wish to make a contribution there -- and earn our respect for doing so.
Ouyang Chiao-fuei is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering at National Central University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS