Despite being NT$60 million short of his financial goal, Lee Chin-ming (
As someone who hails from the area where the school is to be built and as someone who has worked in education, I would like to ask A-ming to please reconsider this matter. It's not too late for him to change his mind.
It has been popular in Taiwan in recent years to found universities and colleges. In central and southern Taiwan, most of these schools commonly lease land from Taiwan Sugar Corp (Taisugar,
The college that A-ming has planned and raised money for is located in Liuying township (
There are already more than 150 universities in Taiwan. Some private universities are in the midst of expanding, racing to beat each other to the top, struggling to create a lasting foundation before they run into trouble. The number of students is increasing and the schools continue to expand, regardless of whether the nation actually needs the new departments and the students they educate. National universities are also expanding, in keeping with the policy of one national university per city and county. Taking advantage of this, colleges are expanding in order to become universities.
But the situation for newly established schools appears to be different. No matter how much idealism they may generate, room for development tends to be tightly constricted. According to estimates given by the Cabinet-level Council for Economic Planning and Development, the number of elementary school students will decrease by 40 percent in the next 50 years, while the junior and senior high school student population will fall by 37 percent. The number of 18-to 21-year-olds will plummet by 50 percent.
Given these trends, existing universities -- already too many in number -- will experience increasing hardship. For those small schools out in the countryside, which lack the benefit of a stable foundation, the situation will likely be even worse.
Twenty years ago, when Japan's economy was still developing, many universities were established in that nation's countryside. Now, more than 500 of these schools are struggling to recruit students. Even attempts to recruit and retain students from China have been unsuccessful. This should serve as a warning to Taiwan.
Beginning in 1988, I served as an adviser to the Ministry of Education in the field of construction, during which time I frequently participated in investigations of schools that were either being established or expanded. When my term concluded in 1994, I became a member of an environmental impact assessment committee under the Environmental Protection Administration and have participated in impact assessments ever since.
During the last 15 years, I have seen just about every case that has arisen relating to the establishment of schools. In the beginning, I was happy to see new schools being built, hoping it would increase the overall population of people in higher education. But in recent years, because of considerations about the future population structure and the present capacity of universities, impact assessments on schools in more remote areas have often carried a warning, and a request to organizers that they reconsider. These warnings, however, have had little effect.
I headed the impact assessment work done on A-ming's proposed university. Upon surveying the site, I discovered that, despite not being legally registered, a large amount of nursery stock had already been grown, to be transplanted during the construction of the school.
I sensed, and could not help but admire, the founders' determination to establish their university. I therefore did not issue a warning. But now, after seeing media reports and seeing that A-ming is still having difficulty raising funds, I feel I really must add a note of caution.
The day for this kind of thing has already passed. I truly don't have the heart to watch the shambles I foresee actually come to pass. But if A-ming wants to take his hard-earned money and do something meaningful for young people in the countryside, he will still be able to fulfill his wish to make a contribution there -- and earn our respect for doing so.
Ouyang Chiao-fuei is a professor at the Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering at National Central University.
Translated by Scudder Smith
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means