In formulating major financial or economic policy, a democratic country will always follow three principles -- no sacrifice of the majority's interests for the minority's interests; no decision-making process at odds with participatory democracy; no damage to security or justice. In the past few days, Formosa Plastics Group (台塑集團) Chairman Wang Yung-ching (王永慶) has been demanding that the government establish direct links with China immediately, or risk Taiwan's industries losing their competitiveness. Kao Ching-yuan (高清愿), chairman of Uni-President Enterprises Corp (統一企業), has said that as soon as direct links begin, Taiwan's stock market will rise to 7,000 points.
Investments by these two tycoons have been pouring into China for years. So they have much to gain from the establishment of direct links. Yet they tell us that the links are in most people's interests, as if they are concerned about the people. Are they right? After direct links begin, Taiwanese capital and talent will pour into China. Tai-wan's industries will hollow out and its economy will decline. Will all this be good for the majority of the people? The tycoons are simply using their "best interest of the people" rationalization to conceal their selfish ambition to sacrifice the social good for their own gains.
Business tycoons are wealthy and powerful. Their every statement and every action has a far-reaching social impact and a strong influence on public opinion. In contrast, workers with neither money nor power, and, indeed, ordinary members of the public, will forever be labeled as anti-business and stubborn conservatives, irrespective of how sound their divergent views may be.
Have these businessmen exercised any self-discipline to restrain themselves from trampling on the popular will and to truly respect the principles of participatory democracy? Have the media given owners of small and medium-sized businesses, workers and the general public the same kind of opportunity to express their views? As tycoons take full advantage of the freedoms offered by a democratic society to increase their fortunes, have they truly respected the democratic mechanism under which everyone has a right to speak up?
These tycoons are always saying that opportunities to make big profits should not be missed. The Chinese government, on the other hand, remains a hawkish totalitarian regime that continues to insist on the right to invade Taiwan. Once direct links are established, Taiwan will effectively have opened its doors, endangering its national security. Must social justice and national security be compromised for profit?
Most of Taiwan's business leaders moved their fortunes and families overseas years ago. If Taiwan comes under siege, they will simply leave. No wonder they can't understand why ordinary people, who have no escape route, are so frightened at the prospect of invasion and the destruction of their homes.
The tycoons are always saying that "businessmen have no mother country." They can go anywhere, as long as there is business to do and money to earn. That's why they loudly advocate direct links and why they call for "one country, two systems." They use the statement that "China also belongs to Taiwan" to echo China's statement that "Taiwan is part of China." These businessmen can hardly wait for unification. Consider all the grateful compliments Chen Yunlin (陳雲林), chief of the Taiwan Affairs Office at China's State Council, showered on them. Suddenly, it seems, these people do have a "mother country," but it is on the other side of the Taiwan Strait. Can we trust them any more?
Wang Yau-de is an associate professor at the the department of management science at National Chiao Tung University.
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Taiwan’s economic momentum, driven by demand for artificial intelligence (AI) products, remains strong, with booming demand for advanced semiconductors, servers and key components. In the first quarter, GDP expanded 14.55 percent year-on-year, the second consecutive quarter of double-digit percentage growth and accelerating from the 12.95 percent expansion in the previous quarter, the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) reported on Friday. Net exports remained the dominant driver of growth, contributing 10.33 percentage points to Taiwan’s GDP growth in the first quarter. That came as exports rose 35.76 percent year-on-year in the first quarter, outpacing 26.34 percent growth in imports, the
RSS