KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) are reportedly teaming up for the next presidential election. The best opportunity for such a partnership, however, has long since passed.
In the 2000 presidential election, had they run as partners, given Soong's wide popular support and Lien's position as favorite, victory would have been assured. No other team could have seriously competed with them.
If the 2004 presidential election is again a race between President Chen Shui-bian (
So while Chen is not necessarily the only serious conten-der, Soong and Lien, individ-ually, are no longer the formidable figures they once were. This is why they must pair up if they are to pose any serious threat to Chen.
The main obstacle to a Lien-Soong ticket, however, remains the fundamental incompatibility of the two men.
Under the KMT's tradition in which power passes from one generation to another, all Lien needed to do to move up the KMT ladder was to acquit himself well in the service of the party supremo. There was little need for his personality and capability to come under close scrutiny.
Lien's presidential defeat was entirely due to a lack of popular support. This is his irreconcilable Achilles' heel.
After the KMT lost power, Lien resorted to a palace coup to succeed to the KMT chairmanship. In the two years that have followed, the party has performed worse and worse. It is no longer the party with an absolute legislative majority and now labels itself the "biggest opposition party." Judging from Lien's performance, it is no wonder that people are calling him the wastrel.
On the other hand, while Soong continues to live in the shadow of the Chung Shing Bills Finance (
Following his defeat in the presidential poll, Soong's new party, the PFP, managed to win over a large number of KMT voters, taking a significant number of legislative seats from the KMT.
The Soong camp continues to look good two years after the presidential election. No wonder Soong is considered so skillful in the art of politics.
So, if anything stands in the way of a Lien-Soong ticket, it is their fundamental incompatibility. Making a team out of the least capable, least charismatic, and least liked person on the one hand and a capable, popular, and charismatic person on the other is an extremely difficult task.
While a Lien-Soong ticket would certainly be a magnet for "pan blue" voters, it is unlikely to win over moderate voters.
This block of voters wouldn't dare let Lien run the country.
Besides, the KMT knows only too well that once a Lien-Soong ticket materializes, it would certainly be Soong calling the shots behind the scenes.
By then, PFP Vice Chairman Chang Chao-hsiung's (張昭雄) comments that "there is no `pan blue' camp, but only a pan-Soong camp" would have come true.
Unfortunately for those who favor a Lien-Soong duet in the 2004 presidential poll, the pair sing in entirely different keys.
Chin Heng-wei is editor in chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS