After four centuries of colonization by the Portuguese and 24 years of brutal annexation by Jakarta, the people of East Timor voted in a 1999 referendum to break away from Indonesia. Now, after much bloodshed and two and a half years of transitional UN governance, East Timor has finally achieved independence, becoming the 192th nation of the world. East Timor's path to statehood holds many lessons for Taiwan.
Under massive pressure to unify with Indonesia, the East Timorese independence movement took good advantage of the political changes that hit the regime of former president Suharto. The leaders of the independence movement demanded -- on a platform of self-determination for residents and a tolerance for dissent -- dialogue with the Indonesian authorities. They also sought support from the international community for a non-violent and a peaceful solution to ending Indonesia's rule. The UN's intervention that lead to tripartite talks between Indonesia, Portugal and East Timor, its organization of a transitional government and its deployment peacekeeping forces, a national referendum and elections -- all these played decisive roles in East Timor's path to statehood.
Even more importantly, the people of East Timor were able to overcome ethnic, language and cultural differences and forge the collective will to compel Indonesia to let their territory become independent.
East Timor has now become a nation, but the prediction by Indonesian nationalists that its independence would lead to the break-up of Indonesia?has not come true. Separatist movements in Aceh, Irian Jaya and elsewhere have not yet achieved much momentum. Even Indonesian President Megawati Sukarnoputri, who opposed East Timor's independence, attended Sunday's ceremony -- an indication that it might be possible to lay the animosity between the two sides to rest. East Timor's independence is a result more of the international respect for the collective will of its people than of the weakening of the Indonesian government.
Taiwan is also standing at a historical crossroads today. Despite differences in historical and geographical background, the wisdom of the East Timorese independence leadership -- and their aggressive quest for international support -- can serve as examples for the people here. Taiwan also endured colonial rule for four centuries -- the Dutch, the Ching dynasty, Japan and finally Chiang Kai-shek's (
Taiwan's opposition movement maintained good relations with the East Timorese movement. Nobel Peace Prize Laureate Jose Ramos-Horta, now his new nation's foreign minister, has visited Taiwan twice and enjoys a good relationship with the DPP. Even though East Timor quickly established diplomatic ties with China, Taiwan still sent its congratulations and expressed its support for the new nation's independence.
During the struggle for independence, the people of East Timor relied on their revolutionary zeal and valor. Now they must rely on wisdom and patience to manage their country as they deal with its multitude of problems, such as the return of refugees from West Timor, reconstruction, massive poverty and implementing a democratic government. The people of East Timor must work hard to make good on their promise to let flowers bloom on stone.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS