Taiwan's bid for observer status to the World Health Assembly (WHA) met with defeat once again. Even more disappointingly, media reports say that anyone born in Taiwan was kept from entering the UN headquarters in Geneva to sit in and listen to the WHA meeting. Even a Taiwanese holding a foreign passport was refused an entry pass if "Taiwan" or "Taipei" was given as the place of birth in their passport. Yang Tzu-hsiung (楊次雄), chairman of First Commercial Bank in New York, who hails from Tainan, was allowed entry, however, because his place of birth is given as China.
Taiwanese can feel free as long as we are in Taiwan. As soon as we pick up our passports, however, we are caught like fish in a dried-out lake, as if we can't even breathe freely -- not to mention express ourselves freely.
The passport is like a little booklet recording the original sin of the people of Taiwan. A leisurely search on the Internet turned up someone claiming to have been "questioned in detail" because customs officials were confused by the English name of the country on his passport, being unable to tell the difference between China and Taiwan. Such experiences highlight the peculiar status of Taiwan and border on discrimination that causes a feeling of being a second-class people. This difficult situation was caused, of course, by China.
China's policies are not too clever. Its government is exhausting itself trying to prevent Taiwanese independence and to make other countries do their utmost to help stop the people of Taiwan from feeling like citizens of a country. But the more the Chinese try to make the people of Taiwan settle for being called citizens of Taiwan Province, the more the people protest about becoming provincial citizens.
To the new generation of independence advocates the passport experience serves the purpose of promoting widespread identification with Taiwan.
DPP Legislator Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) wrote in a campaign pamphlet called My Choice (我的選擇): "Due to my business, I had the opportunity to see some documents regarding the 228 incident and hear a lot of criticism and accusations against the KMT. I have also experienced the feeling of being an international orphan at customs controls in various countries and the bitterness of having my passport stamped with `No Nationality' stamps. I have accumulated many questions over the years ... Waking up after having been cheated for the first half of my life, an irresistible love for a suffering Taiwan has gradually taken root."
China's suppression makes the people of Taiwan pay even more attention to their passports, asking themselves "who am I, really?" The result is that we distance ourselves even further from China's goals, since everyone hopes for the right to a dignified existence. A century ago, Taiwan suffered colonization by Japan. People longed for self-rule and so the gentry and intellectuals joined forces to initiate a petition movement for the establishment of a Taiwan representative assembly.
Some famous Japanese supported the movement, arguing that "if Japan wants to keep Taiwan, we must win the admiration of the Taiwanese people, and to win the admiration of the Taiwanese people we must hurry to establish a Taiwanese assembly." Others, however, scolded these Japanese supporters, and everyone who signed the petition was branded a traitor.
When China sees the word Taiwan, it just wants to start fighting, probably feeling like the opponents of the petition movement, when instead it should consider the friendly admonitions of today's version of those original Japanese supporters.
If you want me to be Chinese, but bar me from entering a UN building to sit in on WHA meetings, how could I be happy with becoming Chinese?
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS