Taiwan's bid for observer status to the World Health Assembly (WHA) met with defeat once again. Even more disappointingly, media reports say that anyone born in Taiwan was kept from entering the UN headquarters in Geneva to sit in and listen to the WHA meeting. Even a Taiwanese holding a foreign passport was refused an entry pass if "Taiwan" or "Taipei" was given as the place of birth in their passport. Yang Tzu-hsiung (楊次雄), chairman of First Commercial Bank in New York, who hails from Tainan, was allowed entry, however, because his place of birth is given as China.
Taiwanese can feel free as long as we are in Taiwan. As soon as we pick up our passports, however, we are caught like fish in a dried-out lake, as if we can't even breathe freely -- not to mention express ourselves freely.
The passport is like a little booklet recording the original sin of the people of Taiwan. A leisurely search on the Internet turned up someone claiming to have been "questioned in detail" because customs officials were confused by the English name of the country on his passport, being unable to tell the difference between China and Taiwan. Such experiences highlight the peculiar status of Taiwan and border on discrimination that causes a feeling of being a second-class people. This difficult situation was caused, of course, by China.
China's policies are not too clever. Its government is exhausting itself trying to prevent Taiwanese independence and to make other countries do their utmost to help stop the people of Taiwan from feeling like citizens of a country. But the more the Chinese try to make the people of Taiwan settle for being called citizens of Taiwan Province, the more the people protest about becoming provincial citizens.
To the new generation of independence advocates the passport experience serves the purpose of promoting widespread identification with Taiwan.
DPP Legislator Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) wrote in a campaign pamphlet called My Choice (我的選擇): "Due to my business, I had the opportunity to see some documents regarding the 228 incident and hear a lot of criticism and accusations against the KMT. I have also experienced the feeling of being an international orphan at customs controls in various countries and the bitterness of having my passport stamped with `No Nationality' stamps. I have accumulated many questions over the years ... Waking up after having been cheated for the first half of my life, an irresistible love for a suffering Taiwan has gradually taken root."
China's suppression makes the people of Taiwan pay even more attention to their passports, asking themselves "who am I, really?" The result is that we distance ourselves even further from China's goals, since everyone hopes for the right to a dignified existence. A century ago, Taiwan suffered colonization by Japan. People longed for self-rule and so the gentry and intellectuals joined forces to initiate a petition movement for the establishment of a Taiwan representative assembly.
Some famous Japanese supported the movement, arguing that "if Japan wants to keep Taiwan, we must win the admiration of the Taiwanese people, and to win the admiration of the Taiwanese people we must hurry to establish a Taiwanese assembly." Others, however, scolded these Japanese supporters, and everyone who signed the petition was branded a traitor.
When China sees the word Taiwan, it just wants to start fighting, probably feeling like the opponents of the petition movement, when instead it should consider the friendly admonitions of today's version of those original Japanese supporters.
If you want me to be Chinese, but bar me from entering a UN building to sit in on WHA meetings, how could I be happy with becoming Chinese?
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS