Taiwan's bid for observer status to the World Health Assembly (WHA) met with defeat once again. Even more disappointingly, media reports say that anyone born in Taiwan was kept from entering the UN headquarters in Geneva to sit in and listen to the WHA meeting. Even a Taiwanese holding a foreign passport was refused an entry pass if "Taiwan" or "Taipei" was given as the place of birth in their passport. Yang Tzu-hsiung (楊次雄), chairman of First Commercial Bank in New York, who hails from Tainan, was allowed entry, however, because his place of birth is given as China.
Taiwanese can feel free as long as we are in Taiwan. As soon as we pick up our passports, however, we are caught like fish in a dried-out lake, as if we can't even breathe freely -- not to mention express ourselves freely.
The passport is like a little booklet recording the original sin of the people of Taiwan. A leisurely search on the Internet turned up someone claiming to have been "questioned in detail" because customs officials were confused by the English name of the country on his passport, being unable to tell the difference between China and Taiwan. Such experiences highlight the peculiar status of Taiwan and border on discrimination that causes a feeling of being a second-class people. This difficult situation was caused, of course, by China.
China's policies are not too clever. Its government is exhausting itself trying to prevent Taiwanese independence and to make other countries do their utmost to help stop the people of Taiwan from feeling like citizens of a country. But the more the Chinese try to make the people of Taiwan settle for being called citizens of Taiwan Province, the more the people protest about becoming provincial citizens.
To the new generation of independence advocates the passport experience serves the purpose of promoting widespread identification with Taiwan.
DPP Legislator Wang Sing-nan (王幸男) wrote in a campaign pamphlet called My Choice (我的選擇): "Due to my business, I had the opportunity to see some documents regarding the 228 incident and hear a lot of criticism and accusations against the KMT. I have also experienced the feeling of being an international orphan at customs controls in various countries and the bitterness of having my passport stamped with `No Nationality' stamps. I have accumulated many questions over the years ... Waking up after having been cheated for the first half of my life, an irresistible love for a suffering Taiwan has gradually taken root."
China's suppression makes the people of Taiwan pay even more attention to their passports, asking themselves "who am I, really?" The result is that we distance ourselves even further from China's goals, since everyone hopes for the right to a dignified existence. A century ago, Taiwan suffered colonization by Japan. People longed for self-rule and so the gentry and intellectuals joined forces to initiate a petition movement for the establishment of a Taiwan representative assembly.
Some famous Japanese supported the movement, arguing that "if Japan wants to keep Taiwan, we must win the admiration of the Taiwanese people, and to win the admiration of the Taiwanese people we must hurry to establish a Taiwanese assembly." Others, however, scolded these Japanese supporters, and everyone who signed the petition was branded a traitor.
When China sees the word Taiwan, it just wants to start fighting, probably feeling like the opponents of the petition movement, when instead it should consider the friendly admonitions of today's version of those original Japanese supporters.
If you want me to be Chinese, but bar me from entering a UN building to sit in on WHA meetings, how could I be happy with becoming Chinese?
Chen Ro-jinn is a freelance writer.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS