Nearly 300,000 junior-high school graduates participated in the two-day Academic Proficiency Examinations on Mother's Day weekend. Ten years after education reform began, it inspires mixed feelings in me, one of which is irony, to witness scenes both inside and outside the examination halls that are essentially no different from those seen before the reform began -- nervous students and parents in no mood to celebrate Mother's Day and high-ranking government officials making the usual rounds.
A primary goal of education reform is to reduce pressure on students. The use of the proficiency exams from last year, however, has not only failed to reduce that pressure, but has in fact intensified it. This year, the problem of junior-high school students taking leave to attend cram schools has become more serious. Reportedly, school administrations are resorting to practically every conceivable means to keep their students in school -- from extending hours to giving additional quizzes -- to help them to maximize their exam scores. The problems that used to bedevil the old Joint Senior High School Entrance Examinations persist, but in a worse form.
Minister of Education Huang Jung-tsun (黃榮村) once said that the nation would never revert to the old system under which entrance exams shackled the students' minds. I agree with him. But the new approach is simply not much better. It has in fact produced a whole new set of problems.
For instance, in the past, joint entrance exams were separately conducted nationwide by several regional examination districts. While all the districts were broadly similar, differences in the characteristics of local communities nevertheless existed. Students competed only against other students in the same district. This arrangement was more congruent with the goal of developing community-based senior-high schools.
In contrast, the new proficiency examination has become the largest entrance exam to be jointly conducted across the nation. In other words, the country has been turned into a king-size testing district. Fierce competition is now underway between all students.
The education ministry's biggest mistake lies in not giving up its preoccupation with tests. In fact, the recruitment of students is a matter for the schools. What the education ministry should be doing is making sure that the students learn effectively, and that the enormous annual education budgets are appropriately distributed and utilized. To guarantee the quality of educational provision, perhaps the education ministry should learn from Western Europe and the US by establishing a standard test, scores in which will serve only as one of a number of criteria for school admission.
The education ministry should also help private organizations establish performance testing centers that will test the students at their request.
Schools could undertake recruitment either independently or in collaboration with one another, depending on their needs and the communities they serve. They could also require applicants to take additional aptitude tests or subject tests whenever they deem necessary.
The ministry should enhance its supervision over school administrations to ensure openness and fairness in student recruitment. It should also establish a special unit to monitor recruitment affairs. Irregularities should be severely punished.
Our experience over the past two years is that the proficiency exams are failing to solve all the problems associated with the joint entrance exam. They also do not tally with the spirit of the education reform. It is to be hoped that new reforms will be carried out soon to save our children.
Huang Der-hsiang is chair of the Graduate Institute of Education at National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS