Nearly 300,000 junior-high school graduates participated in the two-day Academic Proficiency Examinations on Mother's Day weekend. Ten years after education reform began, it inspires mixed feelings in me, one of which is irony, to witness scenes both inside and outside the examination halls that are essentially no different from those seen before the reform began -- nervous students and parents in no mood to celebrate Mother's Day and high-ranking government officials making the usual rounds.
A primary goal of education reform is to reduce pressure on students. The use of the proficiency exams from last year, however, has not only failed to reduce that pressure, but has in fact intensified it. This year, the problem of junior-high school students taking leave to attend cram schools has become more serious. Reportedly, school administrations are resorting to practically every conceivable means to keep their students in school -- from extending hours to giving additional quizzes -- to help them to maximize their exam scores. The problems that used to bedevil the old Joint Senior High School Entrance Examinations persist, but in a worse form.
Minister of Education Huang Jung-tsun (黃榮村) once said that the nation would never revert to the old system under which entrance exams shackled the students' minds. I agree with him. But the new approach is simply not much better. It has in fact produced a whole new set of problems.
For instance, in the past, joint entrance exams were separately conducted nationwide by several regional examination districts. While all the districts were broadly similar, differences in the characteristics of local communities nevertheless existed. Students competed only against other students in the same district. This arrangement was more congruent with the goal of developing community-based senior-high schools.
In contrast, the new proficiency examination has become the largest entrance exam to be jointly conducted across the nation. In other words, the country has been turned into a king-size testing district. Fierce competition is now underway between all students.
The education ministry's biggest mistake lies in not giving up its preoccupation with tests. In fact, the recruitment of students is a matter for the schools. What the education ministry should be doing is making sure that the students learn effectively, and that the enormous annual education budgets are appropriately distributed and utilized. To guarantee the quality of educational provision, perhaps the education ministry should learn from Western Europe and the US by establishing a standard test, scores in which will serve only as one of a number of criteria for school admission.
The education ministry should also help private organizations establish performance testing centers that will test the students at their request.
Schools could undertake recruitment either independently or in collaboration with one another, depending on their needs and the communities they serve. They could also require applicants to take additional aptitude tests or subject tests whenever they deem necessary.
The ministry should enhance its supervision over school administrations to ensure openness and fairness in student recruitment. It should also establish a special unit to monitor recruitment affairs. Irregularities should be severely punished.
Our experience over the past two years is that the proficiency exams are failing to solve all the problems associated with the joint entrance exam. They also do not tally with the spirit of the education reform. It is to be hoped that new reforms will be carried out soon to save our children.
Huang Der-hsiang is chair of the Graduate Institute of Education at National Changhua University of Education.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of