The PFP recently expressed its support for Taipei City Mayor Ma Ying-jeou's (
There has been much discussion about who might run in the 2004 presidential elections. Possible pairings include KMT Chairman Lien Chan (連戰) with PFP Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜), Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) with Ma and even Soong with someone other than Lien. This reflects the fact that voters and politicians are good learners. From past experience, the "pan blue" camp has learned that the keys to success or failure in elections are the preservation of a simple range of possible candidate pairings and the maximization of efforts to mobilize voters with similar preferences.
Over the past decade, splits in the KMT have led to monumental change in the political system. The triggers of those splits were mostly conflicts during election nominations. Differences of ideology further manifested themselves in the departure of the party's elite, as well as the emergence of new political parties.
The New Party's 1993 launch, Jaw Shaw-kang's (
By contrast, the DPP has shown itself to be very stable. Its departed chairmen are all powerless to form competitive political bases, able only to vacillate between the "blue" and "green" camps. As a stable and solid minority force, the DPP has gradually risen to assume the reins of central government power. This shows that winning a democratic election depends not only on the number of votes, but also on the ability to bring voters together and establish a consistent policy direction.
The more stable a party's voter base, the greater its likelihood of winning an election.
This is evident in the fact that, although the number of votes won by the DPP over the last decade has varied little, it has nonetheless experienced a steady rise in its number of legislative seats. Of course, Chen Shui-bian's (
Naturally, many hope that the "pan blue" camp will unite to run integrated election campaigns. The drive toward such cohesiveness is especially strong when there is a candidate highly favored to win. He gives rise to a binding force of expectations, pushing party leaders and candidates toward cooperation.
In this regard, Ma's moves are rather important because he is currently the focus of efforts to forge consensus within the "pan blue" camp. His bid for re-election as Taipei mayor will be a bid for reaffirmation, in which victory will brighten the "pan blue" aura around his head. The KMT and PFP leadership are feeling out the public because the pressure of public expectation is very strong. It dictates the choice of candidates, influences the rise and fall of politicians and determines who will be the leader.
But the choice of Ma also brings two differences of opinion in terms of integration. One is at the elite level and is rarely mentioned, but is rather obvious. If Ma and his generation take over the reins, Lien and Soong will immediately face significant pressure.
In the DPP, the problems of a new generation's takeover were resolved inconspicuously after the departure or retirement of a few party chairmen. The new generation of leaders is relatively younger and more stable. They also bring in a greater depth and breadth of governance. Problems in the integration of the "pan blue" camp manifest themselves in the form of a generational transfer of power. Lien's and Soong's dilemma can be resolved through this process.
Another disagreement is on the more obvious public level: regional disagreements and differences over ancestral origin. That is also why the "Wang-Ma" ticket has been floated while no one has ever talked about a "Soong-Ma" ticket.
The point is not the sentiments over ancestral origins but the ability to integrate voter bases, especially to unite the interests and identities of different ethnic groups. This has always been a common weak spot of the "pan blue" elite. This is also why Chen's camp seems well-prepared for a one-to-one race in the 2004 election, aiming to win voter sympathy through a new "middle way."
Simply put, the "pan blue" camp's hope lies in confirming its choice of Ma. This will become more obvious if he succeeds in his re-election bid. The key to democratic politics is in forming a majority. The formation of a majority depends on effective leadership.
It is to be hoped that stable political leadership will cause the pain of power transitions to fade away, and restore a relatively stable social and economic environment.
Hsu Yung-ming is an assistant professor of political science at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Scudder Smith and Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS