Even though corruption in Taiwan may not be as serious as it is in other places -- Transparency International's latest annual report ranks Taiwan in third place, behind Russia and China -- there is no cause for complacency. In fact the report should serve as a wake-up call for the government, which has made cleaning up political corruption one of its primary goals. Two years of determined effort and the nation is still ranked as high as third?
The Ministry of Justice has received high public approval ratings since Chen Ding-nan (
However, all that hard work has been marred by the fact that many of the key suspects in such cases remain free, thanks to their status as legislators. Others have fled abroad and show no signs of planning to return. Such cases make the average person doubt the ministry's claim that everyone is equal before the law.
The Constitution only exempts legislators from legal responsibility for what they say on the legislative floor, not from criminal liability. The Legislative Yuan should not obstruct the judiciary by repeatedly citing what is clearly an unconstitutional rule that prohibits law enforcement authorities from searching its premises or detaining legislators when the legislature is in session. This rule has only led to legislators implicated in criminal cases fleeing the country before the legislature recesses -- and returning only after the next legislative session has begun. As long as they remain legislators they cannot be summoned for questioning or called into court. If they lose their seat, they can leave the country before the end of their terms and continue to evade investigation.
Legislators should lead by example. They are, and unfortunately, it is in the worst way possible. County and city council members are following suit -- declaring that they must remain above the law while their councils are in session, even if they are facing criminal charges. Two years ago the then speaker of the Chiayi County Council, Hsiao Teng-piao (
Most people don't understand the legal rational for allowing the legislators to break the law with impunity. What they do know is that the average person can't get away with such shenanigans. And they know that such regulations let elected officials get away with murder -- both figuratively and literally. Elected representatives have been linked to crimes such as illegally altering land-use zones, bid-rigging, illegal gravel mining and running gambling dens and brothels. The lesson appears to be that crime does pay, especially if you can get elected to public office.
So why hasn't the government tried to close this loophole? Simple -- some of the very legislators who would have to vote on such a change, are themselves implicated in criminal cases. Those whose hands are clean lack the moral courage to take the initiative and propose an amendment that is guaranteed to make enemies among their colleagues.
This is one of the stark realities of Taiwan's fledgling democracy. As long as such elected officials can get evade the law, the international community will view Taiwan as an "island of greed." This is one stain that will take even more than the much-needed rains to wash away.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS