There are sophisticated penal theories and ethical discourses regarding the abolition of the death penalty, but in this country, at least, one wonders whether it's not even time we go into the debate about those theories and discourses because here the judiciary kills innocent people.
I'm not just saying the criminal justice system sometimes convicts and executes innocent defendants by mistake. Errors of this kind could happen in any country that has capital punishment -- a fact already horrible enough, but what is really appalling here in this democratic state is that the system appears to have no concern for these mistakes.
The Supreme Court recently rejected the extraordinary appeal for death row inmate Hsu Tzu-chiang (
The Control Yuan, after reviewing the case, listed at least five points in which the judiciary was negligent -- even unlawful in handling the Hsu case -- each single point alone should have been enough to overturn his death sentence. The State Public Prosecutor General eventually made an extraordinary appeal for Hsu, after rejecting petitions several times. But the Supreme Court's dismissal leaves these suspicious points unanswered.
Now all hope rests with Minister of Justice Chen Ding-nan (
I've interviewed one of Hsu's relatives. He and the whole family were reluctant to make their campaign to save Hsu public. It was not because the distraught family didn't want to save their loved one, but because they were afraid that they might "irritate" the judicial authorities who would make the ultimate decision. When will the respected judiciary see these people's plight?
I don't know what the Su-preme Court judges discussed behind closed doors. But I expect that they should at least give convincing justification before putting someone to death.
Do they believe that it is "better to kill the innocent than let the guilty go free?" Are they resisting the Control Yuan's interference as a way of defending of the independence of the judi-ciary? Or are they reluctant to face their own errors? Anyone who has read the documents in the Hsu case cannot help having such doubts in mind.
Even those who demand the toughest retribution for criminals should reconsider supporting the abolition of the death penalty because the judiciary that holds the ultimate power over every-one's life is so dangerous and unpredictable.
Jou Ying-cheng is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017