Speaking at a forum on cross-strait issues held in China on Thursday, former vice chairman of the Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS, 海協會), Tang Shubei (唐樹備) said that under the premise of the `one country, two systems,' Taiwan can enjoy treatment in accordance with the model of Hong Kong's return to the motherland -- i.e. playing at election politics and playing the stock market. But Taiwanese who hear such nonsense won't be angered. Tang's words only have the effect of reminding us that Taiwan is better off steering as far away from China as possible. How unfortunate it would be to accept the proposal of such an idiot official.
Tang is a veteran of China's Taiwan-affairs bureaucracy and has visited Taiwan. But his understanding of Taiwan remains shallow. Clearly, he doesn't see Taiwan's social diversity. He still thinks that apart from electoral politics, Taiwanese only care about getting rich in the stock market and that nothing else exists for them. This seems to show that the gulf in thinking between Taiwanese and Chinese is getting harder to bridge. Tang certainly has a way of using words to highlight his own ignorance.
On the other hand, people who love Hong Kong would be deeply saddened to hear Tang's reiteration of the "dance as usual, horse-racing as usual" promises made by China before the 1997 takeover. Tang's remarks fully reflect the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) leadership's ignorance of the reasons why such remarks hurt knowledgeable Hong Kongers. Ballrooms and racetracks were merely places where Hong Kongers could intoxicate themselves while under British colonial rule. They are merely superficial phenomena and by no means realistic portraits of Hong Kong society.
For Hong Kong intellectuals, the unification slogans brought up by Beijing catered to the vulgar taste of Hong Kong's tycoons and were insulting. It was almost like saying most Hong Kongers were living befuddled lives.
Today, Tang has painted such crude unification ploys as being effective in Hong Kong. Obviously, the Communist Party has lost its ability to soul-search and can't distinguish justice from evil.
According to Tang's logic, China will guarantee that the people of Taiwan can continue to hold their elections and play the stock market under Chinese rule. But these activities have long been legal in Taiwan. Taiwan does not need to unify with China to be able to enjoy this "fun." So why should it unify with China? Tang's offers are therefore not the least bit attractive.
If Beijing wants to cheat the people of Taiwan, it will have to offer some real incentives. UN membership, for example, might move some people's hearts. If the Communist Party simply tries to dangle a carrot that the Taiwanese already have in the hopes of encouraging them to surrender, that is simply self-deception.
The Chinese leadership several years ago said publicly that vice president would be the highest position a Taiwanese could occupy in a post-unification China, vice chairman being the highest in a post-unification Communist Party. We have not seen any further explanation from Beijing on why a Taiwanese person could not become president or CCP chairman. Such open discrimination, stupid in the extreme, came from the mouths of high-level CCP officials.
Taiwanese with any wisdom would give someone like Tang a wide berth so as not to let themselves be infuriated and their health be damaged by his flummery.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95
RSS