In terms of judicial human rights, the main concern of human-rights activists is whether law enforcement indeed follows due process, so as to avoid violating the legal rights of defendants and crime suspects. It does not mean defendants and crime suspects are immune from criminal prosecution and punishment because of the rights they enjoy.
Article 23 of the ROC Constitution provides that the law may restrict citizens' freedoms out of the need to uphold social order or facilitate public interests. For this reason, Article 109 of the Criminal Code states that criminal sanctions shall be imposed against anyone who discloses national defense secrets.
Such conduct is also considered a type of "offense against the external security of the state (外患罪)." The legislative intent of Article 109 is that, since such conduct violates national law and interests, violators must be legally prosecuted and punished. Otherwise, social order may be in danger of destruction, and public welfare harmed.
In advanced democratic societies, the media is referred to as the "fourth branch" with power on par with those of the executive, legislative and judicial branches of the government. These four powers ought to check and balance each other, rather than allow any one power to overpower the others.
In other words, while the ideal of press freedom should be respected by the government, members of the news media must also respect and treasure their profession's integrity and strictly abide by their profession's ethics. They must exercise self discipline and fulfill their social responsibilities so as to win approval of the readers. Otherwise, the abuse of press freedom will only trample the professional dignity of the news media. If their conduct exceeds the permissible legal bounds, and goes as far as violating national, social or individual legal interests, criminal prosecution must still be pursued in order to uphold the universality of law and justice.
There is room for debate on whether the government prosecution and investigative units' recent raid of news media was indeed in compliance with criminal litigation procedure law. However, if any members of the media are suspected of violating criminal law, in view of the principle of "equal protection of the law," they must all accept the legal consequences of their actions. What right do members of the media have to claim immunity from the law?
In sum, the sanctity of press freedom exists only within the confines of law and justice. On the other hand, the nation's law enforcement must comply with the legally-mandated due process in all cases, not just in cases where media is involved. Whether press freedom is being abused or whether the powers of law-enforcement are being properly exercised are two issues that deserve the scrutiny of the entire nation. This is what human rights is all about.
Hsu Wen-pin is the chairman of the Chinese Association for Human Rights.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers