Gordon Chang (
In it, Chang observes some important aspects of China's economy, including its all-pervasive corruption, its state-owned enterprises, the varying ideologies which underpin it, and the finance and banking sectors. It is a good book that shatters many myths about China and serves as a timely warning to Taiwanese proponents of the "go west" dictum.
China's economy has grown rapidly over the past ten years or so, attracting massive foreign capital as it has done so. Statistics released by China's communist government, however, have recently met with skepticism from all corners. Xiong Zhengnan, director of policy and regulations at China's National Bureau of Statistics, told the London-based Financial Times that a survey conducted between May and October last year uncovered at least 60,000 violations of laws governing the reporting of statistics in China.
A Chinese report in 1999 also showed that 89 percent of state-owned enterprises fabricated their incomes and expenditures.
Albert Keidel, who worked in the World Bank's Beijing office in the 1990s, has written in a private report to the China Economic Quarterly that China's official economic figures exaggerate actual growth. The situation was especially serious in the late 1990s.
Underlings cheat their superiors, who in turn cheat outsiders. This is an old disease of communist regimes. In 1958, the "Great Helmsman" Mao Zedong (
Today, the fabrications have spread to economic growth figures. Thomas Rawski, a professor of economics at the University of Pittsburgh, has presented statistical evidence from the China Statistical Yearbook implying that China's GDP grew by 24 percent between 1997 and 2000. Energy consumption, however, declined by 12.8 percent over the same period. Job opportunities created during this time, as well as rises in commodity prices, were either moderate or negative. The views of the optimists simply don't stand up to analysis against the mass of negative statistics.
Unemployment in China's farming villages is now as high as 160 million, with another estimated 20 million expected to lose their jobs in the wake of China's entry into the WTO. China plans to dole out 290 billion yuan over the next four years to write off bad loans owed by bankrupt companies. Meanwhile, the withdrawal of some state-owned enterprises from the market will present the problem of resettling more than 5.7 million workers. Corruption has also been an obstacle to trade. Chinese courts last year handled 21,800 cases of corruption and bribery. Economic losses caused by corruption amounted to almost 15 percent of China's GDP between 1999 and 2001. And economic loss is only the tip of the iceberg of problems caused by corruption.
In his book, Chang blames dogma for the slow speed of China's reforms. The Communist Party's mission is to rule the people. Democracy and freedom are anathema to it. But democratic systems and guarantees of private property rights are important factors in a country's economic stability. The Asian Wall Street Journal once used the fable of the tortoise and the hare to describe China and India, the world's two most populous nations. It said that Chinese officials were free to drive farmers off the farm or suppress labor unions in order to attract foreign investment. Such methods appear conducive to short-term economic development. China's communist government, however, has not provided concrete guarantees for the property rights and freedom of its citizens, the article said, and may therefore turn out to be no match for democratic India.
According to the latest statistics compiled by the Bureau of Foreign Trade under the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the share of Taiwan's trade that depends on the China market rose from 9.1 percent in 1991 to 16.5 percent in 1996. The figure for last year approached 20 percent, making Taiwan the country most dependent on the China market. The constant need to readjust and re-evaluate is now widely recognized among international investors in China. In contrast, Taiwanese businessmen and some politicians are calling on people to walk into the lion's den. I hope these red-capped businessmen will not be so foolhardy as to drag Taiwan to the grave to be buried along with them.
Chiu Li-li is a Tainan City councilor.
Translated by Francis Huang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS