On the surface, the national security leaks over the past week appear to have been merely a round of muckraking. Only a judicial probe will confirm whether they involve corruption. In fact, the leaks were an undiluted case of political wrangling. If we look at their deeper significance, however, the leaks are simply a matter of Taiwanese society paying for democracy obtained on the cheap.
Taiwan, unlike neighboring South Korea or the Philippines and even far-away East European countries, did not experience fierce mass protests and street fighting in the process of democratization. Only after much blood was shed did authoritarian or communist regimes lose power. Only after people paid a very high price -- many with their lives -- did their nations taste the sweet fruit of democracy. The "quiet revolution" that the Taiwanese have been so proud of in fact came too easily. The only person who actually sacrificed his life for the cause was Cheng Nan-jung (
Taiwan's democracy has been endowed "from the top down" by its rulers. If the late Chiang Ching-kuo (
The reason Taiwan's democracy is unlike that of her neighbors, which won democracy "from the bottom up," is because the Taiwanese people do not have the guts, are too compromising, and have not devoted enough effort to the endeavor. This is what we must reflect on and feel ashamed about.
Because Taiwan sacrificed so little for its democratization, she had almost no opportunity to learn from the losses such sacrifice brings.
That is why the recent leaking of state secrets is having such a massive impact on society. That is why the case has triggered a debate on the question of which is more important -- national security or freedom of the press.
For the most part, this is not an issue in advanced democracies. Only in a country like Taiwan, a "democratic toddler" with an inadequate legal system, can people have such divergent views and be at such a loss over the issue.
Now, even the loyalty of ethnic mainlanders has come under suspicion. The ethnic confrontation in Taiwanese society, while it has been subsiding, can be re-ignited at anytime.
Taiwan is also in a unique situation in that we face the massive military threat of communist China, whose ambition to gobble up Taiwan has not eased for a single day. The people of Taiwan cannot completely let their guard down.
Nor should the international community measure Taiwan by the yardstick of a mature democracy. This is to say nothing of groups that are more loyal to Beijing than to the democratically-generated Taiwan government. It is difficult for the outside world to imagine the political absurdity that exists in Taiwan.
Even so, we will not dilute the implementation of democracy because of this situation or ethnic conflict. On the contrary, we expect Taiwan to develop into an even more pluralistic and progressive society.
We would also like to advise politicians and media with ulterior motives never to abuse this situation to achieve private political ambitions, much less sacrifice the security and interests of the majority of Taiwanese for such ends. We hope politicians from both the ruling party and the opposition camp will have a basic sense of historical responsibility.
Never ignore the basic loyalty toward one's country or sell out one's country, thereby leaving a stinking name for yourself in Taiwan's history.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS