It takes time and resources to cultivate talent. The KMT was in power for more than 50 years. It therefore has a large pool of talent at its disposal after a long process of cultivation. As for the DPP, the party took power before the development of its elite was complete. To gain power in a country is one thing; to rule a country is quite another. Although the DPP has found itself obliged to borrow talent from other parties, it is crucial that the party come up with its own scheme to develop talent -- one that is able to ensure long-term peace and national stability.
I believe that the following characterize the DPP's current policy to develop talent:
First, it has recruited talent from everywhere except within. The DPP has only gradually cultivated its own government team while recruiting talent from all sides. After coming to power, the government suffered badly as a result of a series of internal and external matters, such as the disputes over the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and working hours, the battles between the ruling and opposition camps, the record high unemployment rate, the international economic downturn and the relocation of Taiwanese businesses to China. As a result, the government has had no choice but to recruit talent from all sides while at the same time seeking to cultivate its own staff.
Second, it has grown in both its idealism and its realism. The DPP is certainly a party with aspirations. But many of its Cabinet members are inexperienced. The party's ideology, meanwhile, is not recognized by either the opposition parties or the Chinese government, for all President Chen Shui-bian's (
Third, the party is moving forward while learning how to control the government machine and realizing certain administrative goals. It has taken time for the government and the old bureaucracy to begin to operate in full harmony to achieve the DPP's goals. The poor performance of the Cabinet should surprise no one, since the government's leaders have had no time to train their colleagues.
The government can be expected to continue to borrow talent from all sides as it continues to develop its own staff. Indeed, it has no choice but to rely heavily on financial and economic talent from other parties as it strives for economic prosperity. But the most important task facing the DPP is to establish a scheme to develop talented figures in order to prepare itself for long-term governance. From the president down to each and every Cabinet mem-ber, the party should actively cultivate as many potential successors as possible, not just one or two. Any evaluation of the performance of a head of government should take account of the number of people he is actively cultivating for leadership positions.
Chen Ming-chang is a professor of business administration at National Taipei University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS