KMT spokesman Wu Ching-ji (
The KMT says its policy is motivated by the need to institutionalize political accountability by parties. In other words, if non-DPP people join the Cabinet, it will be harder to hold the DPP accountable for policy problems or errors. Who are they kidding? The KMT's apparent belief that the public is too stupid to figure out who to blame if you have a president from the DPP and a DPP government but some non-DPP Cabinet members is downright insulting.
That the KMT appears to have an abundance of talented people, especially in the fields of finance and trade, is due more to Taiwan's recent history than the party's ability to cultivate great minds. During its decades-long authoritarian rule, joining the KMT was the only way to have a political career and contribute to the country. Given the party's historical inability to differentiate between itself and the nation, one might ask how much of the nurturing of party talent was provided by national, rather than party, resources? Under the circumstances, using political accountability as an excuse to keep KMT talent from joining the Cabinet is yet another sign that the party has always placed its own interests above those of the nation.
The most obvious victim of the KMT's policy is newly-elected at-large legislator Chiang Ping-kun (
Then there is the dilemma of General Tang Yao-ming (
The KMT has been relentless in its condemnation of former members who have joined the Cabinet as traitors selfishly selling out the party for their own interests. Apparently the KMT believes that its members must not only put party loyalty above all else, but that the party-member bond is equivalent to the marriage vow of "until death do us apart."
It is too bad that the KMT doesn't believe in political accountablitity -- or loyalty for that matter -- when it comes to party members who have shown themselves more than willing to toady up to Beijing in return for business or political favors. Nary a harsh word has been heard from KMT headquarters about these people "selfishly selling out the party for their own interests."
Any KMT members joining the Cabinet deserve a pat on the back for placing national interests first -- if not a rousing cheer. Whether they choose to resign their party membership or face expulsion, these people will be able to hold their heads high, confident in the knowledge that the people of Taiwan appreciate what they are doing, even if their former comrades are incapable of doing so.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS