The fourth Legislative Yuan was probably no worse than its predecessor. However, the behavior of many of its members right before their departure still made people shake their heads. While many laws may have been enacted, many problems remain.
The fourth Legislative Yuan passed 624 bills, more than any previous legislative session. Many of the bills passed were related to the Economic Development Advisory Conference (EDAC, 經發會). Their enactment deserves recognition, as they constitute a major contribution to the revival of Taiwan's economy. However, it is disappointing that the Financial Supervisory Board Organization Law (金融監督委員會組織法), key to successful reform of Taiwan's financial system, was not passed because of serious disagreement over how to choose board members.
The Legislative Yuan also approved the government budget for the fiscal year 2002. Concerned that major budget cuts would prompt attacks by the ruling party, the opposition parties adopted a new strategy, under which major cuts were made to annual government revenues, but smaller cuts were made to government expenditures. As a result, a record-breaking NT$8.5 billion was cut from the budget. The opposition parties did not review the budget item by item. Instead, they first decided on the dollar amount of the cut, and then asked the government to comply with the demand. The amendment to the Law Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) was passed in a similarly violent manner. In both cases, power struggles among the political parties replaced rational discussion.
Opposition lawmakers could also be accused of procrastination. They completed much of their work right before the end of the session. They convened for 48 hours straight in a marathon final meeting. This is not how things should be. The Legislative Yuan should establish a model of regular and periodic negotiations between the opposition and ruling parties to improve legislative efficiency. Abusing their legislative majority, the opposition has refused to engage in negotiation and randomly deleted budgets at will. This irresponsible behavior by the KMT is an insult to the KMT's 50 years' experience as a ruling party.
Even so, lawmakers' efficiency has improved somewhat, although their sense of judgement and self-discipline have further to go. For example, a small number of lawmakers tried to bring former legislators under the same regulations as former politically appointed officials (政務官). Then, to help Tainan County Legislator Hung Yu-chin (洪玉欽), who was defeated in the December elections, the KMT tried to take advantage of a sickly PFP lawmaker by amending the Election and Recall Law (選罷法). The KMT tried to amend the law so that a deceased lawmaker's vacancy may be filled without an election. And the regulation on compensation to veterans of the 1958 cross-strait conflict may have been smuggled through had the media not voiced its strong opposition. The alleged collective bribery of lawmakers for their endorsement of the Electronic Game Regulation Act (電子遊戲場業管理條例) triggered calls for the passage of a political donations law. However, lawmakers still refused to put a rope around their own necks, and the law did not pass.
In the future, no party will have a majority in the legislature. But the ruling "pan-green" and the opposition "pan-blue" groups are relatively equal in strength. A balance of terror may be maintained between them. However, the opposition won't have an absolute majority to abuse. So, a rational negotiation mechanism should be established to foster a democratic congressional culture. Hopefully, the chaos in the past legislative session might be the darkness before the dawn.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
The military is conducting its annual Han Kuang exercises in phases. The minister of national defense recently said that this year’s scenarios would simulate defending the nation against possible actions the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) might take in an invasion of Taiwan, making the threat of a speculated Chinese invasion in 2027 a heated agenda item again. That year, also referred to as the “Davidson window,” is named after then-US Indo-Pacific Command Admiral Philip Davidson, who in 2021 warned that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had instructed the PLA to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. Xi in 2017
RSS