As election day draws ever closer, nearly 100,000 prosecutors, police officers, investigators and military police are working night and day to investigate vote-buying. Determined to root out vote-buying and campaign violence this year, the government is actively promoting its anti-vote-buying message.
Two thousand vote-buying cases brought to the attention of investigators have been handled in recent days. Those accused include legislators, township heads and vote captains (
Investigating vote-buying is inherently difficult. The vote captains, who do the buying, are extremely inconspicuous, appearing and disappearing like shadows. Only if tips are accurate and followed up by immediate investigation can culprits be caught in possession of incriminating evidence.
If law enforcement officials fails to arrive in time, the criminal activity is completed in a matter of minutes, and the evidence disappears, making the crime difficult to prosecute. If you wish to report vote-buying, please know that every second counts -- just as though you were fighting a fire.
Vote-buying is a criminal act, and someone caught in flagrante delicto can be arrested by anyone. In order to make every second count, it is best to seize the culprit at the scene of the crime and hand him over to the authorities, or at least prevent his escape and immediately call the police. While such actions might involve difficulties, there is a reward of over NT$500,000, so you can do something for yourself while also benefitting the country. It's well worth it.
Investigations into vote-buying must gather tangible evidence before suspects can be prosecuted, so evidence-gathering must be timely. Search and seizure, arrest and summons -- each link in the chain must be executed with lightning speed. Taking action a day, or even a few hours too late -- when evidence can easily be destroyed and the suspect has left the scene -- is all too common. Prosecutors, police and investigators should recognize the crucial importance of acting promptly.
The purpose of vote-buying is to get elected. If prosecutors can't make prompt indictments when investigating vote-buying, their performance will be marred. In the past, many prosecutors avoided handing down indictments before the election -- even if they had clear evidence -- for fear of criticism from candidates and the public and to avoid influencing election results.
As a result, candidates didn't care if their vote-buying was discovered. Prosecutors should completely discard such misgivings. An election should be a fair competition in which the best person wins. If one candidate has already purchased votes to create an unfair competitive environment, why shouldn't prosecutors hand down indictments before the election so that voters know the facts and can make an informed choice?
Rational voters know that an indictment does not amount to a conviction. They will pay attention to the demands of social justice and the content of reports before conscientiously casting their ballots. If a candidate has clearly carried out or benefitted from vote-buying, what right does he have to run for office and be elected?
In today's society, in which the boundaries between right and wrong have become blurred, whether an indictment would influence voters remains to be seen. But rational people will certainly demand that charges be brought whenever possible prior to elections because, at the very least, nobody wants to see a situation in which vote buyers get elected and honest candidates suffer defeat.
Although an indictment can be brought against a candidate who gets elected, that candidate retains his privileges as the incumbent prior to a guilty verdict and a ruling annulling the election victory. The Election and Recall Law (
Vote-buying has been around as long as there have been elections, but eradicating it is not an impossible task. People must wake up to and stand together against vote-buying, promptly reporting all occurances. Police, investigators and judges must act in a timely manner, gathering evidence and conducting investigations quickly and with attention to detail, handing down indictments and making judgements. If this happens, the eradication of vote-buying and improvement of the quality of our democracy will be more than just a dream.
Chu Nan is chief prosecutor in the Kaohsiung district prosecutor's office.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS