As election day draws ever closer, nearly 100,000 prosecutors, police officers, investigators and military police are working night and day to investigate vote-buying. Determined to root out vote-buying and campaign violence this year, the government is actively promoting its anti-vote-buying message.
Two thousand vote-buying cases brought to the attention of investigators have been handled in recent days. Those accused include legislators, township heads and vote captains (
Investigating vote-buying is inherently difficult. The vote captains, who do the buying, are extremely inconspicuous, appearing and disappearing like shadows. Only if tips are accurate and followed up by immediate investigation can culprits be caught in possession of incriminating evidence.
If law enforcement officials fails to arrive in time, the criminal activity is completed in a matter of minutes, and the evidence disappears, making the crime difficult to prosecute. If you wish to report vote-buying, please know that every second counts -- just as though you were fighting a fire.
Vote-buying is a criminal act, and someone caught in flagrante delicto can be arrested by anyone. In order to make every second count, it is best to seize the culprit at the scene of the crime and hand him over to the authorities, or at least prevent his escape and immediately call the police. While such actions might involve difficulties, there is a reward of over NT$500,000, so you can do something for yourself while also benefitting the country. It's well worth it.
Investigations into vote-buying must gather tangible evidence before suspects can be prosecuted, so evidence-gathering must be timely. Search and seizure, arrest and summons -- each link in the chain must be executed with lightning speed. Taking action a day, or even a few hours too late -- when evidence can easily be destroyed and the suspect has left the scene -- is all too common. Prosecutors, police and investigators should recognize the crucial importance of acting promptly.
The purpose of vote-buying is to get elected. If prosecutors can't make prompt indictments when investigating vote-buying, their performance will be marred. In the past, many prosecutors avoided handing down indictments before the election -- even if they had clear evidence -- for fear of criticism from candidates and the public and to avoid influencing election results.
As a result, candidates didn't care if their vote-buying was discovered. Prosecutors should completely discard such misgivings. An election should be a fair competition in which the best person wins. If one candidate has already purchased votes to create an unfair competitive environment, why shouldn't prosecutors hand down indictments before the election so that voters know the facts and can make an informed choice?
Rational voters know that an indictment does not amount to a conviction. They will pay attention to the demands of social justice and the content of reports before conscientiously casting their ballots. If a candidate has clearly carried out or benefitted from vote-buying, what right does he have to run for office and be elected?
In today's society, in which the boundaries between right and wrong have become blurred, whether an indictment would influence voters remains to be seen. But rational people will certainly demand that charges be brought whenever possible prior to elections because, at the very least, nobody wants to see a situation in which vote buyers get elected and honest candidates suffer defeat.
Although an indictment can be brought against a candidate who gets elected, that candidate retains his privileges as the incumbent prior to a guilty verdict and a ruling annulling the election victory. The Election and Recall Law (
Vote-buying has been around as long as there have been elections, but eradicating it is not an impossible task. People must wake up to and stand together against vote-buying, promptly reporting all occurances. Police, investigators and judges must act in a timely manner, gathering evidence and conducting investigations quickly and with attention to detail, handing down indictments and making judgements. If this happens, the eradication of vote-buying and improvement of the quality of our democracy will be more than just a dream.
Chu Nan is chief prosecutor in the Kaohsiung district prosecutor's office.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
There will be a new presidential administration in the United States in January 2025. It will be important for the Lai (賴清德) administration and America’s next administration to get on the same page quickly and visibly in respective efforts to bolster Taiwan’s security, economic vitality, and dignity and respect on the world stage. One key measure for doing so will be whether Washington and Taipei can coalesce around a common narrative for moving US-Taiwan relations forward. In recent years, Washington and Taipei have leaned into fear as a motivator for coordinated action. For a time, both sides publicly reinforced each other’s
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
Embroiled in multiple scandals, Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) on Thursday announced that he would apply for a three-month leave of absence from his role as party leader, creating uncertainty about the future of the TPP and the “new politics” that he had promised to bring. Shortly after his announcement, Ko’s home and office were searched and he was questioned by prosecutors over his suspected involvement in a corruption case related to a real-estate development project. He was arrested early Saturday morning after he refused to be questioned at night and attempted to leave the prosecutors’ office. In
RSS