For those sick of the chaos resulting from the break-ups and mergers of Taiwan's political parties, things may soon get much easier. If, after Saturday's elections, all the parties, factions and independent legislators in the Legislative Yuan can end up clearly divided into two camps of relatively equal strength, political stability has a much better chance of making an appearance in the legislature. The legislature's "Warring States era" (
None of the major parties are expected to win a majority in the Legislative Yuan. The DPP and the KMT are likely to continue to be the two biggest parties and the numbers of seats that each of them hold is likely to be extremely close. Under such circumstances, the one which can form a legislative majority will get to call the shots. Therefore, those parties, factions, or independents capable of providing the badly-needed backing will end up the big winners -- by auctioning its support to the highest bidder.
The one exception is the Taiwan Solidarity Union, which doesn't appear likely to engage in such back-room deals. Although former president Lee Teng-hui (
As for the People First Party, all the signs indicate that it thinks it will reap a windfall if it plays its cards right, because it thinks the TSU won't be able to provide the DPP with sufficient backing to form a majority. What ransom could the PFP possibly demand from the KMT or the DPP? Very possibly the right to organize the Cabinet.
After all, PFP Chairman James Soong (
For this reason, the PFP scorned at the three-in-one idea proposed by the New Party candidate Yok Mu-ming (
However, things would be completely different if the DPP, TSU and other lawmakers from the so-called "localization camp" of the KMT or PFP form an alliance -- the so-called alliance for national stabilization (
Even more importantly, a DPP poll indicates that 57 percent of voters support the idea of such a pro-government alliance. It is time politicians listened to the people for a change, instead of just each other.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS