The people of Taiwan face important choices in the Dec. 1 city and county chief and legislative elections. It needs to be said that the viewpoints and rhetoric articulated during the campaign constantly reflect the fact that we are still constrained by historical feuds and other divisive factors. As a result, we have heard mainly scurrilous attacks, but have seen few far-sighted political platforms. This situation truly worries all those concerned about Taiwan's future.
This reminds me of the inspiration contained in The Gospel of Luke (Luke 5:4-10). As he addressed his disciple, Simon (Peter), Jesus saw that he had "worked hard all night but caught nothing" as he tried to catch fish. He then asked Simon to "put out into deep water." Although doubtful, Simon followed Jesus' words. As a result, "they caught such a large number of fish that their nets began to break. So they signaled their partners in the other boat to come and help them."
This biblical description of Simon working hard all night and yet catching nothing reflects Taiwan's situation. Even though we enjoy the democratic right to take part in the political process, we have been constantly engaged in superficial quarrels and ideological conflict. Not only does this cost the country dearly, but the situation might even get worse. Uneasiness and distrust among the public will trigger further clashes.
Taiwan's political elite -- including all the city and county chief and legislative candidates, and especially the leaders of the major parties -- are absolutely obliged to lead the 23 million people of Taiwan toward deep water so that they can clearly see the real problems, challenges and opportunities facing Taiwan. They should then propose strategies in response and help to realize the peoples' hopes.
Taiwan's problems include crises in public order and family values, rising unemployment, labor rights disputes, poverty among Aboriginal communities, educational rights disputes, a sharp decrease in investment due to lack of business confidence and the challenges facing the society and economy after accession to the WTO. These are the matters with which society should concern itself and the key issues for voters in the elections.
If a political party fails to meet voters' expectations on these issues, there is no reason whatsoever to support such a party and its candidates.
I call on the responsible and far-sighted parties of Taiwan to immediately stop the meaningless war of words and the use of ethnic issues to provoke conflict for political gain. They should instead respond to Taiwan's deep-seated needs and problems. Only in this way can we recognize the importance of ethnic harmony and embrace the challenges and promises that our young century has in store.
Paul Shan is a Roman Catholic cardinal, based in Kaohsiung.
Translated by Jackie Lin
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS