Much depends on whether the KMT will do well enough this coming Saturday for its chairman, Lien Chan (連戰), to keep his job. Until recently, and officially even now, the KMT hopes and believes that it will win more seats than any other party and be able to ally with its pan-blue friends to force the president to hand the authority to appoint the Cabinet to the opposition. This is what lies behind Lien's repeated calls for "following the Constitution."
Even Lien, with the bluntest political antennae on the island, seems to understand that this is now a pipe dream. For one thing, there is no unity in the pan-blue camp; James Soong's loathing of Lien has became embarrassingly apparent. For another, the KMT's election campaign appears to be running into trouble. The message that only the KMT can fix the economy is not being bought; the "stability vote" -- the votes of those who just want the chaos to end -- goes by default to the party of government, now of course, the DPP; the fierce crackdown on vote-buying is hurting the KMT's voter mobilization and a goodly proportion of voters prefer the real KMT principles of People First Party Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) to the pathetic attempt by Lien to cloak his own lack of direction and vision in the so-called glories of the KMT's past.
The assumption now appears to be that Lien will indeed have to go. Certainly the fight has begun to pick over the party's carcass. Last week we saw overtures to Soong to return to the party; yesterday we saw an extremely wacky piece of political theater as KMT legislative candidates Chen Horng-chi (陳鴻基) and Chen Hsueh-fen (陳雪芬), accompanied actors imitating President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Lien Chan, and walked down a red carpet between KMT headquarters and the Presidential Office to symbolizing the need for cooperation between the two major parties.
Here we see the two sides of coming intra-party strife maneuvering into position. On one side will be the residual Taiwan firsters, who will claim that Lien's repudiation of Lee Teng-hui's (
If the Taiwan firsters win then there is no reason why they could not work successfully and productively with the DPP to regain the kind of consensus politics that Taiwan used to know under Lee Teng-hui. That of course would be an ideal situation, but whether it is achievable after Lien's reregistration drive has so radicalized the party faithful -- in the wrong direction -- is open to doubt.
The worst scenario of all would be for the KMT to do well enough for Lien to keep his job. Then we would have a continuation of KMT obstructionism with perhaps a KMT-PFP demand to form the Cabinet. Probably the president would rather see a no-confidence vote on the premier followed by a dissolution of the legislature and another election. In this scenario the DPP would probably gain, as many Taiwanese realized that the way out of political turmoil was to give the government the power to govern.
Only one thing is certain. The results on Saturday night will only decide starting positions in a contest for power that could take months to resolve itself. It is as well that the new legislature does not begin sitting until February next year. Hopefully by then, some of the fog of battle might have cleared.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS