While the world's attention was on the WTO meeting in Qatar, another important meeting took place in Morocco. The seventh Conference of the Parties to the Climate Convention met in Marrakech for two weeks ending Nov. 9 to discuss the final binding regulations of the Kyoto Protocol. The protocol seeks to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming, an issue that should be of much interest to Taiwan, which is surrounded by rising seas and is struck by typhoons every year.
This was the largest, most important international meeting since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, with 4,500 people from 171 countries participating, including 44 Cabinet ministers. The meeting decided the scope of emission reductions for six greenhouse gases, the implementation timetable, methods of calculating emissions and mechanisms to provide flexibility in compliance.
The Kyoto Protocol was born from the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. It was signed in 1997 in Kyoto and required that 38 industrialized nations reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases (primarily carbon dioxide) by an average of 5.2 percent, taking them below 1990 levels. Since 1992, seven conferences have tightened the strictures of the treaty. The standards for reducing emissions have transformed from statements of principle to bylaws governing implementation with the binding force of law.
These climate talks are the result of an increasing body of scientific evidence on global warming. In 1988, the UN Environment Program and World Meteorological Organization established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Three working groups were set up to assess the scientific aspects of the climate system, climate change and its impact, and to assess policy options for limiting greenhouse-gas emissions. The IPCC has issued scientific assessment reports in 1990, 1995 and this year. This year's report showed that, based on current emissions levels and rate of warming, in the next 100 years the average global temperature will rise by up to 5.8C. Sea levels will rise by nearly one meter as the polar ice caps melt. This prediction was more dire than that of a 1995 report predicting temperatures will rise between 1.5C and 3C. Based on day-to-day experience, one might think fluctuations in temperature each day of a few degrees are normal and of no significance. But changes in the average global temperature are very slow. For example, in the past 100 years, temperatures rose by only about 0.6C.
Global warming results in part from the rise in human economic activity, excessive use of fossil fuels, and deforestation. The increase in a country's use of energy resources is usually directly proportional to its economic growth. This is the heart of the problem. Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases highlights dilemmas about the use of resources, industrial structures, economic development, and the balance of interests. Emissions of greenhouse gases is an international problem. Some people call the emissions from industrialized countries "wealth pollution." Emissions from developing countries are considered "poverty pollution." The root of the difficulty with climate negotiations stems from the need to share the costs of pollution and realize emissions reductions.
A rise in the sea level might seem a remote problem, but climate irregularities and weather extremes caused by global warming are right before our eyes. Related phenomena that have appeared one after another in Taiwan include more clement winters, changes in the seasons of certain fish, reduced harvests of green plums, changes in rainfall patterns, abnormal typhoon movements, drought, the unstable supply of agricultural products, and so on.
Global warming has already caused serious damage to Taiwan. The bizarre thing is that in the struggle for precedence between the many policy issues under public debate, global warming has not received the attention it deserves. Instead, disastrous damage tends to be handled after the crisis has occurred. Frequent elections have not only failed to initiate a policy debate, they have actually marginalized environmental issues even more.
International relations have long been focused on the management of political, military and economic affairs. In fact, environmental issues, which transcend political boundaries, are playing a more and more salient role on the international stage. As we confront the trend toward globalization and evaluate its progress, global warming will have to be seriously considered.
Lee Ho-ching is director of the Center of International Programs at Chung Yuan Christian University.
Translated by Ethan Harkness
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS