The Wine and Tobacco Tax Act (
The government has adopted a rationing measure to deal with the shortage, under which each household is required to show its household registration (
One way to avoid the problem is to allow competition. During the transition period before the implementation of the new act, the government should allow private wine-making businesses to provide alternative products, so the public won't be forced to hunt around for red-label rice wine. The best solution would be to implement the tax hike immediately and allow the market to return to normal at the new level.
However, the government cannot leave the issue alone. Its new rationing measures failed to alleviate the shortage. This is because the government has not come to terms with the need to liberalize the market.
Traditionally the government has regarded rice wine and cigarettes as necessities in people's lives and provided them cheaply. As a result, rice wine has become an integral part of the diet in Taiwan. Now, the government is adopting tax rates on rice wine and distilled alcohol in accordance with the rest of the world. The Executive Yuan, in fact, is using the excuse of WTO accession to raise the nation's wine and tobacco taxes. According to the new act, the government is allowed to levy lower taxes on weaker rice wine, with less than 20 percent alcohol, so that the public may enjoy cheap rice wine. But this will not help the government maintain its wine tax revenues because the same rate would also apply to imports of the same potency.
The act went through its third reading in the legislature in April. But the government failed to enact it promptly. The DPP would never have to face today's difficulty if it had implemented the new tax act as scheduled last September.
The rice wine shortage is a result of political interference. Now, the government is interfering with the matter again by implementing rationing. Discontent among the people will only rise further, as the government is compounding the problem.
The DPP government, which is inexperienced, did not implement the former KMT government's new tax act on schedule and is living with the consequences. Not only has the government lost the opportunity of receiving NT$25 billion of taxes in the past year, but the DPP's election chances have also suffered.
Jan Shoujung is an assistant to Taiwan Independence Party legislator Lee Ching-hsiung.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS