Beginning Jan. 1, Chinese will be able to come to Taiwan for sightseeing. However, there is a catch -- they must be either permanent residents or students in foreign countries. Obviously, this requirement minimizes the impact of this partial opening. However, it is important to keep in mind that China's stubborn refusal to negotiate with the Taiwan government on the issue has prevented a major breakthrough.
Perhaps deliberately, or out of genuine ignorance, critics of the partial opening conveniently forget that it takes two to tango. It is wrong to think that the minute Taiwan rolls out the red carpet, millions of Chinese tourists will swarm in. After all, China still imposes strict controls on international and even domestic travel by its citizens.
In China, even getting a passport is a huge project, riddled with numerous restrictions. For example, to ease the problem of Chinese women working as prostitutes in Southeast Asia, single women not accompanied by their parents are unlikely to be issued a passport. Furthermore, usually only residents of large cities can get passports.
Four years after Hong Kong's handover, China only next month will abolish the quota on Chinese citizens traveling to Hong Kong. The time is ripe to lift the restriction, now that Hong Kong's freedom of speech and rule of law have been watered down so much that Chinese travelers won't be polluted by these "Western poisons." Probably, until Taiwan can live up, or rather down, to China's standard in this regard, China won't expose its people to the "germs" of democracy in Taiwan.
For Chinese residing abroad, it is less of a problem, as they will not be traveling directly from China to Taiwan. Of course, in view of their government's record in arresting on espionage charges Chinese scholars living abroad who have traveled to Taiwan, they should probably think twice before coming here.
Furthermore, restricting the welcome to Chinese living abroad should minimize the number of Chinese tourists seeking to stay here illegally. Had China's government been willing to negotiate with Taiwan's government, the handling of illegal immigrants would present fewer problems. However, since China isn't willing to talk, all Taiwan can do is minimize the number of illegal immigrants this way. After all, Taiwan is already having enough difficulty dealing with an influx of illegal Chinese immigrants without having Chinese tourists here.
It is not exaggerating to say that hundreds of millions of Chinese would emigrate if they had the chance. Once they get away, whether on student visas, temporary work visas, or just tourist visas, they do everything possible to stay away. For example, China's political and religious persecution has victimized many of its people. Many Chinese are so desperate to stay in countries such as the US that they file for political asylum by fabricating stories. This is why a lot of law offices run by ethnic-Chinese in southern California specialize in the handling of political asylum cases. But it is fair to assume that those who have already got out to live in another country are unlikely to want to reside illegally in Taiwan.
Eager to poke holes in every move the government makes, an opposition lawmaker has commented, "How many Chinese residing abroad could there possibly be." The answer is rather a lot. Students from China are the largest group among all the foreign students in the US. Chinese immigrants have taken over San Gabriel, California, formerly known as "Little Taipei" but now more suitably known as "Little Shanghai." Naturally, how many of them want to come and visit Taiwan is another story. But at this point, this partial opening of tourism to Chinese citizens is the best that Taiwan's government could do and to demand more is plain folly.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS