Beginning Jan. 1, Chinese will be able to come to Taiwan for sightseeing. However, there is a catch -- they must be either permanent residents or students in foreign countries. Obviously, this requirement minimizes the impact of this partial opening. However, it is important to keep in mind that China's stubborn refusal to negotiate with the Taiwan government on the issue has prevented a major breakthrough.
Perhaps deliberately, or out of genuine ignorance, critics of the partial opening conveniently forget that it takes two to tango. It is wrong to think that the minute Taiwan rolls out the red carpet, millions of Chinese tourists will swarm in. After all, China still imposes strict controls on international and even domestic travel by its citizens.
In China, even getting a passport is a huge project, riddled with numerous restrictions. For example, to ease the problem of Chinese women working as prostitutes in Southeast Asia, single women not accompanied by their parents are unlikely to be issued a passport. Furthermore, usually only residents of large cities can get passports.
Four years after Hong Kong's handover, China only next month will abolish the quota on Chinese citizens traveling to Hong Kong. The time is ripe to lift the restriction, now that Hong Kong's freedom of speech and rule of law have been watered down so much that Chinese travelers won't be polluted by these "Western poisons." Probably, until Taiwan can live up, or rather down, to China's standard in this regard, China won't expose its people to the "germs" of democracy in Taiwan.
For Chinese residing abroad, it is less of a problem, as they will not be traveling directly from China to Taiwan. Of course, in view of their government's record in arresting on espionage charges Chinese scholars living abroad who have traveled to Taiwan, they should probably think twice before coming here.
Furthermore, restricting the welcome to Chinese living abroad should minimize the number of Chinese tourists seeking to stay here illegally. Had China's government been willing to negotiate with Taiwan's government, the handling of illegal immigrants would present fewer problems. However, since China isn't willing to talk, all Taiwan can do is minimize the number of illegal immigrants this way. After all, Taiwan is already having enough difficulty dealing with an influx of illegal Chinese immigrants without having Chinese tourists here.
It is not exaggerating to say that hundreds of millions of Chinese would emigrate if they had the chance. Once they get away, whether on student visas, temporary work visas, or just tourist visas, they do everything possible to stay away. For example, China's political and religious persecution has victimized many of its people. Many Chinese are so desperate to stay in countries such as the US that they file for political asylum by fabricating stories. This is why a lot of law offices run by ethnic-Chinese in southern California specialize in the handling of political asylum cases. But it is fair to assume that those who have already got out to live in another country are unlikely to want to reside illegally in Taiwan.
Eager to poke holes in every move the government makes, an opposition lawmaker has commented, "How many Chinese residing abroad could there possibly be." The answer is rather a lot. Students from China are the largest group among all the foreign students in the US. Chinese immigrants have taken over San Gabriel, California, formerly known as "Little Taipei" but now more suitably known as "Little Shanghai." Naturally, how many of them want to come and visit Taiwan is another story. But at this point, this partial opening of tourism to Chinese citizens is the best that Taiwan's government could do and to demand more is plain folly.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS