Two months ago this newspaper warned about China's secret assistance to Taiwan's opposition parties in the Dec. 1 elections -- a story the world heard about in a CNN report on Wednesday. The CNN report pointed out that during closed-door meetings with important KMT personnel, China's officials promised to give the KMT support to ensure the DPP loses the elections -- by reducing the number of seats held by the DPP in the Legislative Yuan.
Even though Taiwan's biggest opposition party has strongly denied the veracity of the CNN report, there are good reasons to believe it is close to the truth. The party's conduct since it lost last year's presidential election has made it appear to be a puppet dancing to China's manipulations to disrupt Taiwan's political stability.
For example, in autumn last year the KMT and other opposition parties abused their legislative majority in an attempt to recall President Chen Shui-bian (
China has made repeated attempts to interfere whenever Taiwan has held elections. China's missile tests in March 1996 and subsequent military practices during Taiwan's elections clearly demonstrate the degree to which it is willing to go to meddle. Thankfully, however, each time Beijing has tried large-scale intimidation tactics, its plans have backfired by triggering widespread among the voters of Taiwan. Parties and candidates whom China strongly disapproved of won with landslides victories, such as former president Lee Teng-hui (
The only way Taiwan can survive living next to such a bully is to firmly stand its ground. In each election the people of Taiwan must continue to tell China, through their votes, that they do not welcome any political interference from the other side of the Strait.
Some people, of course, do vote for pro-Beijing politicians, but they are not representative of the general public and have no chance of becoming a majority. So Beijing is just wasting its money by supporting political dinosaurs who don't seem to realize they are close to extinction. While localized parties which advocate a "Taiwan first" ideology have not yet become a stable legislative majority, they will, given time. It is even possible that this goal of many Taiwanese will become a reality after next week's legislative elections.
This newspaper has said before and will continue to press home the message that the voters of Taiwan must use every opportunity they have to tell Beijing loud and clear that no matter how much money China spends, no matter how much aid it might give opposition parties to help them buy TV and newspaper ads, or how many military exercises it stages, the people of Taiwan should and will continue to say "no" to Beijing.
By choosing candidates who truly advocate the "Taiwan first" ideology, voters will be ensuring that they and their descendents will enjoy the right to vote and to live in a democratic nation.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS