EU's denial of visa ironic
There has never been a greater irony than the EU's denial of a visa to President Chen Shui-bian (
Has Europe forgotten the painful lesson of British prime minister Neville Chamberlain's failed appeasement policy toward the Nazis? Chen is a freedom fighter while China's authoritarian regime is a notorious suppressor of freedom. What moral value is the EU trying to promote? Caving in to Beijing's pressure now will only encourage the bully to be even more aggressive later.
President George W. Bush said "You're either with us or against us." Apparently, he meant that there is no gray area between support for and opposition to terrorism. In practice, it is far more difficult to draw a line in the case of terrorism. Even the BBC World Service has decided to refrain from calling the Sept.11 attacks in the US terrorist.
The world is a closely interwoven fabric. Trade and exchanges between countries are indispensable for prosperity and survival. The EU, the US and even Taiwan have to do business with China. But this should be conducted in accordance with international rules and moral values.
When the world compromises these rules and values, it will just reap more chaos and disorder. The EU should take note.
Yang Ji-charng
Columbus, Ohio
Justice as an aim of policy
After a period of studied restraint following the terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the US government has now achieved success in using limited military means in its bid to eliminate the staging area of possible future terrorist attacks. This was wisely accompanied by wide-ranging humanitarian and diplomatic actions to help Aghan civilians. The dual tactics of war and peace have brought about change in a troubled country -- a change that augurs well for future developments within and around Afghanistan.
The Bush administration's priority is to bring the leading terrorists to justice, rather than retribution and revenge. Bush and his Cabinet deserve praise for this -- as does the attitude of the American people. Justice has not yet been achieved, but with justice as the US motivation -- rather than being motivated by geopolitical considerations and retaliation -- the world remains sympathetic and supportive toward the US.
In 1991, the Gulf War ended in the liberation of Kuwait. But justice was not done. A plunderer had ravaged a home and was then driven out by friends and neighbors. But the plunderer had set fire to that home, leaving wanton destruction behind. This plunderer still hasn't been punished. He was allowed to lick his wounds and to keep on harboring and encouraging terrorists.
To punish Iraqi leader Sad-dam Hussein personally then was considered "politically impossible." It was said that the US had no mandate from the UN or from the US Congress to take so serious a step. And public opinion insisted on bringing US soldiers home.
An attack on Iraq is being contemplated now. What is the moral conscience of the US and the UN on this question? Does the statute of limitations apply in international law? Should Iraq be punished now for its invasion of Kuwait and the damage done to that country? If it was morally and legally justifiable to punish Iraq in such a manner 10 years ago, then what has happened to New York and Washington could have been prevented.
The present crisis seems to show that in war, as in peace, justice is becoming a more dominant force in the moral make-up of the world's population than ever before. This also seem to be the case when we look at the policy-making of governments -- it seems to be driven more by a sense of justice than ever before. To do what is right has greater glory than might.
Lew Yu-Tang
Taipei
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS