The issue of direct links has once again become the center of the cross-strait tussle. On the surface, the governments on both sides seem to be promoting new measures conducive to cross-strait trade. However, a closer look reveals complex political motivations behind Beijing's ostensibly innocuous moves. In fact, it shows a sugar-coated poison pill on offer from Beijing.
The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a plan to expand the functions and scope of Taiwan's offshore transshipment centers. The new measure will allow for the processing of raw materials and semi-finished goods from China. After bonded entry into Taiwan through the Kaohsiung harbor, Chinese goods will be processed at export-processing zones, bonded factories, industrial parks, bonded warehouses and distribution centers. The 35 percent added value ceiling for the processing businesses will also be abolished.
These are concrete measures by the Taiwan government to actualize the "active opening, effective management" policy proposed by the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It is also a move aimed at improving cross-strait relations. Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
Meanwhile, Zhang Mingqing (張銘清), spokesperson at the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, said his country had agreed to allow Taiwanese civilian airplanes to fly over its airspace in the South China Sea en route to Southeast Asia. Zhang added that China also welcomes Taiwanese airlines to fly over Chinese airspace en route to Europe.
By using Chinese airspace, Taiwanese airlines can avoid flying over warring Afghanistan, shorten their routes and save fuel. The use of Chinese airspace will save each Taiwanese airline an estimated NT$500 million annually, which will translate into savings of NT$3,000 per passenger in terms of ticket prices. Taiwanese airlines are now bending over backwards to take advantage of this.
But Beijing is dangling the offer of using its airspace to Taiwanese carriers over the head of the Taiwan government. Through its agent in Taiwan, ultra-unificationist lawmaker Elmer Feng (
By pushing its schemes over the head of the Taiwanese government, Beijing is trying to turn Taiwanese businesses and the public against their own government. And now Quislings like Feng are trying to use legislative pressure in the form of a threatened budget boycott, in pursuit of this aim. If the government agrees to let its civil airlines fly over Chinese airspace under the current circumstances, Taiwan's national security will be seriously compromised. If on the other hand the government does not agree, it will meet the wrath of Taiwanese businesses. In either scenario, Beijing emerges the winner, catching a big fish with a tiny piece of bait.
Taiwanese business should understand the difficulties facing the government, especially in light of Chinese foreign minister Tang Jiaxuan's (
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS