The issue of direct links has once again become the center of the cross-strait tussle. On the surface, the governments on both sides seem to be promoting new measures conducive to cross-strait trade. However, a closer look reveals complex political motivations behind Beijing's ostensibly innocuous moves. In fact, it shows a sugar-coated poison pill on offer from Beijing.
The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a plan to expand the functions and scope of Taiwan's offshore transshipment centers. The new measure will allow for the processing of raw materials and semi-finished goods from China. After bonded entry into Taiwan through the Kaohsiung harbor, Chinese goods will be processed at export-processing zones, bonded factories, industrial parks, bonded warehouses and distribution centers. The 35 percent added value ceiling for the processing businesses will also be abolished.
These are concrete measures by the Taiwan government to actualize the "active opening, effective management" policy proposed by the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It is also a move aimed at improving cross-strait relations. Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
Meanwhile, Zhang Mingqing (張銘清), spokesperson at the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, said his country had agreed to allow Taiwanese civilian airplanes to fly over its airspace in the South China Sea en route to Southeast Asia. Zhang added that China also welcomes Taiwanese airlines to fly over Chinese airspace en route to Europe.
By using Chinese airspace, Taiwanese airlines can avoid flying over warring Afghanistan, shorten their routes and save fuel. The use of Chinese airspace will save each Taiwanese airline an estimated NT$500 million annually, which will translate into savings of NT$3,000 per passenger in terms of ticket prices. Taiwanese airlines are now bending over backwards to take advantage of this.
But Beijing is dangling the offer of using its airspace to Taiwanese carriers over the head of the Taiwan government. Through its agent in Taiwan, ultra-unificationist lawmaker Elmer Feng (
By pushing its schemes over the head of the Taiwanese government, Beijing is trying to turn Taiwanese businesses and the public against their own government. And now Quislings like Feng are trying to use legislative pressure in the form of a threatened budget boycott, in pursuit of this aim. If the government agrees to let its civil airlines fly over Chinese airspace under the current circumstances, Taiwan's national security will be seriously compromised. If on the other hand the government does not agree, it will meet the wrath of Taiwanese businesses. In either scenario, Beijing emerges the winner, catching a big fish with a tiny piece of bait.
Taiwanese business should understand the difficulties facing the government, especially in light of Chinese foreign minister Tang Jiaxuan's (
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS