The issue of direct links has once again become the center of the cross-strait tussle. On the surface, the governments on both sides seem to be promoting new measures conducive to cross-strait trade. However, a closer look reveals complex political motivations behind Beijing's ostensibly innocuous moves. In fact, it shows a sugar-coated poison pill on offer from Beijing.
The Executive Yuan yesterday approved a plan to expand the functions and scope of Taiwan's offshore transshipment centers. The new measure will allow for the processing of raw materials and semi-finished goods from China. After bonded entry into Taiwan through the Kaohsiung harbor, Chinese goods will be processed at export-processing zones, bonded factories, industrial parks, bonded warehouses and distribution centers. The 35 percent added value ceiling for the processing businesses will also be abolished.
These are concrete measures by the Taiwan government to actualize the "active opening, effective management" policy proposed by the Economic Development Advisory Conference. It is also a move aimed at improving cross-strait relations. Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
Meanwhile, Zhang Mingqing (張銘清), spokesperson at the Taiwan Affairs Office of China's State Council, said his country had agreed to allow Taiwanese civilian airplanes to fly over its airspace in the South China Sea en route to Southeast Asia. Zhang added that China also welcomes Taiwanese airlines to fly over Chinese airspace en route to Europe.
By using Chinese airspace, Taiwanese airlines can avoid flying over warring Afghanistan, shorten their routes and save fuel. The use of Chinese airspace will save each Taiwanese airline an estimated NT$500 million annually, which will translate into savings of NT$3,000 per passenger in terms of ticket prices. Taiwanese airlines are now bending over backwards to take advantage of this.
But Beijing is dangling the offer of using its airspace to Taiwanese carriers over the head of the Taiwan government. Through its agent in Taiwan, ultra-unificationist lawmaker Elmer Feng (
By pushing its schemes over the head of the Taiwanese government, Beijing is trying to turn Taiwanese businesses and the public against their own government. And now Quislings like Feng are trying to use legislative pressure in the form of a threatened budget boycott, in pursuit of this aim. If the government agrees to let its civil airlines fly over Chinese airspace under the current circumstances, Taiwan's national security will be seriously compromised. If on the other hand the government does not agree, it will meet the wrath of Taiwanese businesses. In either scenario, Beijing emerges the winner, catching a big fish with a tiny piece of bait.
Taiwanese business should understand the difficulties facing the government, especially in light of Chinese foreign minister Tang Jiaxuan's (
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS